NHS and Canada's Healthcare Services!

First, they have a whole Wikipedia page "criticisms of the NHS"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_National_Health_Service#Access_controls_and_waiting_lists

waiting lists...superbugs...paying twice...

Oh, heres an article from 2000, lets see, NHS managers to blame for problems...due to poor management not lack of funding says this BBC article...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/844852.stm

11 years later, 2011 NHS problems continue to haunt coalition government...seems like they didn't solve anything in a decade...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/joepublic/2011/jun/14/nhs-reform-problems-haunt-coalition

Just today! boy dies of thirst due to lazy nurses in hospital! seems like the british medical staff aren't as professional as they could be...wonder why?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/9386835/Kane-Gorny-inquest-doctors-did-not-know-patient-22-who-died-of-thirst-was-there.html

I can't wait for Obamacare to kick in! 

let's see, Canada? 

Heres a bit of news off Wikipedia, lets see if they're doing any better?

The median wait time in Canada to see a special physician is a little over four weeks with 89.5% waiting fewer than 90 days.^[52]

The median wait time for diagnostic services such as MRI and CAT scans ^[53] is two weeks with 86.4% waiting fewer than 90 days.^[52]

The median wait time for surgery is four weeks with 82.2% waiting fewer than 90 days.^[52]

Another study by the Commonwealth Fund found that 57% of Canadians reported waiting 30 days (4 weeks) or more to see a specialist, broadly in line with the current official statistics. A quarter (24%) of all Canadians waited 4 hours or more in the emergency room.^[54]

Sounds great!  I'll just be over here reading Golf Magazine waiting my 4 hours with a bullet in me in the ER waiting room, no worries.

Heres something to look forward to:

http://articles.cnn.com/2009-07-06/politics/canadian.health.care.system_1_government-run-health-health-care-system-mayo-clinic?_s=PM:POLITICS

.

OBAMA IS ONE, BIG, LYING JERK!

Obama said recently on his Campaign Bus tour that Romney’s experience has been in owning companies that outsource jobs, while “my experience has been in saving the American automobile industry.”

First of all – this outsourcing comment is absolute nonsense. If we didn’t outsource jobs your iPhone would cost you $2500 and an iPad would be around $4000. Thanks to outsourcing you can buy a computer – a computer that vastly increases your own job performance and profitability – for under $1000. End outsourcing and you’ll be paying ten grand for that computer. And for the dedicated Obama voters .. those Nikes would cost you hundreds of dollars more per pair.

And what about this “saving the American automobile industry” crap!  Obama did NOT save the American automobile industry. Obama saved the United Auto Worker’s Union (UAW).

The automobile industry was going to survive one way or the other. That’s what bankruptcy laws are for. General Motors, for instance, probably would have filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition, just as Delta Airlines and many other prominent American companies have done. GM would then have abrogated some contracts, revised others, streamlined operations, shut some plants … or, in other words, reorganize! That’s what a Chapter 11 bankruptcy is! Reorganization! Now this reorganization idea did not sit that well with the UAW. Under a Chapter 11 bankruptcy GM could have gone to the UAW and forced them into contract concessions involving both pay and benefits .. including an end to the asinine jobs banks .. and this would be very bad for union leaders indeed. So the union bosses got to Obama .. and Obama stepped in. Truth is, Obama just threw the law aside … tossed hundreds of years of bankruptcy law aside … and, as a ruler, rather than a leader, would do, forced the parties into an arrangement that gave the unions what they wanted while royally screwing secured creditors.

Where are we now? GM is operating, but not doing all that well. The Chevy Volt is a government-subsidized boondoggle. And the federal government still owns massive amounts of GM stock. Now Obama promised that this stock would be sold, the taxpayers would make a profit, and GM would return to private ownership. Hasn’t happened. Why? Because if Obama sold that GM stock right now the U.S. taxpayers would take a $35 Billion dollar hit. That’s Billion, not million. Pay attention.

Oh .. and don’t forget the hundreds of GM dealers that Obama ordered closed .. and the employees of those dealers who lost their jobs.

Obama is a one, big, lying jerk....and this is just one example of how he proves it time and time again.
.

DO LIBERALS EVER SPEND THEIR OWN MONEY ON ANYTHING?

Is there no limit as to how low class these moochers can be?

Just when you thought the Obama campaign couldn’t get any more desperate, they come up with this: the Obama Event Registry, asking supporters who are getting married, having a birthday, or celebrating an anniversary to direct gift-givers to Obama’s re-election website.

This is truly insulting. Young couples have been the folks hardest hit by the Obama economy; unemployment rate among the young is at all-time highs. Yet Obama suggests that we should send money not to those couples, but to the campaign of the man who has put them on the bread lines.

Will these moochers ever stop trying to get their hands on our wallets?
.

MODERN DAY VERSION OF 'TRAIL OF TEARS!'

That Elizabeth Warren, the wealthy libtard who is trying to unseat Republican Scott Brown in the U.S. Senate, exploited the rich history of our Native cultures for personal gain and academic accolades while actual indigenous students struggled, is reprehensible.

After succeeding in that exploitation and personal gain, Warren refused to give back to the culture she exploited. How much would it have meant to have a real "woman of color," a real American Indian female educator at Harvard who used her position to bring greater awareness to the educational needs of indigenous Americans?

Instead Elizabeth Warren snubs Cherokee activists when they try to meet with her. Check it out.

Just another glaring example of liberal hypocrisy!
.

HEY LIBTARDS, WHEN JON STEWART IS OUTRAGED OVER HOLDER AND OBAMA YOU KNOW THE HYPOCRISY IS BLATANT!

The one person who understands the seriousness of Operation Fast & Furious is a comedian.
Comedy Central's liberal icon Jon Stewart not only told his "Daily Show" viewers about Fast & Furious last night, but he called out the Democratic hypocrisy concerning executive privilege.

There’s no spin or distortion. The only problem I have is he didn’t mention the name of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry who died allegedly from a Fast & Furious weapon.

Even when he explains that Fast & Furious was supposed to be a tactic to find out where the gunrunners got the guns for the cartel, you can tell he’s in disbelief that our government would do this. As Stewart states, they got the guns from our government!

Stewart even included the fact that the Department of Justice lied in its Feb. 4 letter and had to retract it nine months later.

Then it’s time for the issue of executive privilege, and Stewart isn’t falling for the Democrats defense tactics. He’s also upset how the Democrats who were outraged when President George W. Bush cited executive privilege aren’t outraged about President Obama's use of the legal maneuver.

Frankly, everyone should be outraged about this situation no matter their ideological bent. Our government allowed known gun smugglers to buy guns and give them to the drug cartels without anyway of tracing them. And, as a result, Terry and roughly 300 Mexicans are dead.
.

HEY HOLDER, YOU SNIVELING WEASEL, WHY AREN'T YOU FILING A LAWSUIT ABOUT THIS?

WHAT A HUMUNGOUS HYPOCRITE!!!!!

At a recent Obama rally in Ohio, prospective attendees were told to brandish their photo IDs if they expected admittance to the rally. No word yet on whether Attorney General Eric Holder plans to file suit against the Obama campaign for infringing upon Ohioans' right of peaceful assembly by way of a racist photo ID rule.

    Jessica Kershaw, the Obama campaign's Ohio Press Secretary, confirmed in a statement to BuzzFeed that the campaign checked every supporter's identification at the door.

    "We checked every ID at the door to make sure it matched with the name on the ticket that supporters filled out," she said. "We did this for every person who came in."

Since President Obama sides with Holder in thinking it's racist for states to require photo identification to vote, he must be apoplectic at himself for discriminating against those who don't get state-issued photo IDs. By asking for rally-goers to provide photo ID before entry, the Obama campaign is silently sanctioning the effectiveness of photo identification.

What makes a rally different from voter integrity? What makes buying cigarettes, alcohol, renting a car, a hotel room, cashing a check, opening a bank account, membership at the Y, buying cold medicine, or entering a club any different? You check photo identification to protect the thing which such an exchange accesses and to confirm that you are the age you claim. Is a person's vote less unworthy of protection than buying Sudafed -- or attending an Obama rally?
.

Big Three Ignore Religious Freedom Rallies

CBS Played Up Dissenting Catholics' Protests

Published: 6/11/2012 6:10 PM ET 

 

 ABC, CBS, and NBC stayed true to their liberal slant and ignored the 164 rallies across the United States on Friday against the federal government's abortifacient/birth control mandate under ObamaCare. Religious leaders and conservative politicians, like former GOP presidential candidate Rep. Michele Bachmann, addressed the tens of thousands of pro-religious freedom activists who attended the rallies. But the Big Three apparently didn't think this was worthy of coverage on their morning and evening newscasts.

By contrast, CBS played up the supporters of a group of left-leaning Catholic nuns during four on-air segments between May 30 and June 1, 2012. Correspondent Wyatt Andrews hyped how "hundreds of Catholics have rallied behind the sisters," and that "protests in support of the nuns have been held in almost 50 cities." 

 

For full story go to:   http://www.mrc.org/biasalerts/big-three-ignore-religious-freedom-rallies-cbs-played-dissenting-catholics-protests

.