This will illustrate how badly Obama has screwed things up with his Keynesian economic policies. In a speech delivered to a labor union convention in September of 2009, Barack Obama said the following:
“All in all, many middle-class families will see their incomes go up by about $3,000 because of the Recovery Act, helping them get back much of what they've lost due to this recession.”
The Recovery Act? That was Obama’s $850 billion dollar stimulus job that failed to stimulate. We were told it would create jobs. Now, two years later, the Obama junta can only weakly mew that it “saved” jobs …. We’re so impressed. So, two years and $800+ billion later, how did it REALLY turn out?
According to a Sentier report using Census data, the median American household income has actually fallen during the “recovery.” “Real income fell by 3.2 percent during the recession. And during the recovery it went down by 6.7 percent.” So “income has declined twice as much in the recovery as in the recession itself.”
Oops. Obama says that the stimulus act is going to raise middle class incomes by about $3,000 per household --- and those incomes have fallen by 6.7%. Who’s fault is this? Need you ask? It’s Bush’s fault, of course!
Now just in case you’re one of those Americans who haven’t bought into this “Bush’s fault” horse crap, take a look at some of Obama’s initiatives and see if we can start to form an understanding as to just why government spending and increased regulation hasn’t been the “stimulus” he promised:
Stimulus – Failed
Cash for Clunkers – Failed
Mortgage Relief – Failed
ObamaCare – Failed
Dodd-Frank – Failed
And on top of this record spending and increased regulation he wants to add … tax increases?
Go ahead folks. Support this incompetent leftist in his bid for reelection. Incompetent? Have you ever taken a look at his record as a community organizer in Chicago? We haven’t found a record of one single community organizing initiative championed or led by Barack Obama in Chicago that showed any lasting positive results. He was as much of a failure there as he is as our president.
Support Obama – then vote for him – and tell your children how you played such a huge role in destroying any chance they may have had for a lifestyle any better than the one they’re experiencing now.
.
Showing posts with label B.O. lies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label B.O. lies. Show all posts
Friday, November 11, 2011
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
THIS IS WELL WORTH PASSING ON
President ME has called for a "full-scale attack." Yeah ... aren't you just oh so excited! Obama finally gets it and he's going to launch a full scale attack to get our economy growing again?
Sorry ... but I'm really getting sick of this nonsense and the narcissistic boob that's spouting this crap from the Rose Garden. That's right .. notify the Soros myrmidons at Media Matters. I just referred to Obama the Obtuse as a "narcissistic boob." I've had it. I'm fed up. I still have enormous respect for the office of the presidency .. but absolutely none - not one stitch - for the self-involved incompetent and corrupt person who holds that office now ... courtesy of millions of voters who glom on to mindless slogans and a Republican Party that complete squandered a mandate.
Actually ... that "Obama the Obtuse" line, though it sounds clever, isn't quite right. Obama isn't obtuse .. at least now as I understand the word. "Obtuse" means "difficult to understand;" and there is nothing difficult to understand about Obama. He said five days before his coronation that he was going to "fundamentally transform the United States of America," and he meant it. He had every intention of transforming the United States from a nation where people seek self reliance to a nation where the masses seek government-provided security; From a nation with a dynamic free market economy to a clone of the European-Socialist welfare state; from a nation where the majority worship God to a nation where the people worship, as Obama does, the God of Government.
Oh yeah .. Obama is going to launch his "full-scale attack" to get the economy back on its feet. Don't the dumb masses understand that Obama launched his attack 19 months ago?
Obama says that his administration is "hard at work" looking for new ways to promote economic growth. Sure he is. Any work he's doing to find a way to promote economic growth pales to the effort he puts in every day of his life to promote government growth.
Perhaps you've heard the sound bites from yesterday. Obama has this grand new bill he wants the Republicans to support that is supposed to really get things hopping again. What does the bill entail? More government spending, that's what! Basically it's a small business lending bill ... government backed and subsidized lending. He says the GOP has been blockading the bill. Did he happen to mention that the Senate Democrats absolutely refuse to allow the Republicans to propose any amendments to the bill? Look! The Democrats have a majority in the Senate! Let the Republicans propose their amendments, then vote them down! There's your blockade ... but somehow that's just fine with Obama. He preached all this bi-partisanship stuff when he was running for president ... but never meant a word of it.
Lending to small businesses? Is Obama trying to tell us that there's no available money to loan to small businesses right now? Let him explain why small banks are sitting on one trillion dollars in excess reserves right now .. but somehow don't want to put that money into the lending marketplace? Wait --- I'll tell you. He doesn't know. You could take what Obama knows about small business and the mindset of the people who own them and shove up an ant's ass and it would rattle around like a marble in the Super Dome.
These small banks aren't lending right now because they have no confidence that the small businesses they might loan their excess reserves to will be able to pay the back. Simple as that. These business owners are under assault. There's ObamaCare, the financial reform act, tax increases, card check and the empowerment of unions, Cap and Trade ... as my father (a red-ass Marine if there ever was one) would say, these small businesses don't know whether to $h1t or go blind right now ... they are no more in a mood to borrow for expansion than the banks are to loan them money.
Do you know what small business owners - the principal job creators in our economy - talk about over their morning coffee? They're laughing their butts off at Obama's promise to eliminate their capital gains taxes. Hell ... most of them; the vast majority of them don't PAY capital gains taxes! What does it matter to them if capital gains taxes are eliminated? This is like telling hookers you're going to eliminate their unemployment insurance taxes. Oh yeah ... that ought to bring down the price of a little tang in a big way.
Now I may concede the point to you that Obama really does want to do what he can to get the economy moving right now .. but that's only because there's an election on the horizon and he's afraid of losing his support structure on Capitol Hill. There's two problems though:
Right now we have dozens of federal agencies that are working on more than 120 new rule-makings under ObamaCare and the wonderful financial overhaul bill. Businessmen have no idea what those new rules and regulations will entail. They've found out about the 1099 reporting debacle under ObamaCare. What's next? The rules aren't even written yet, and when they are written they will be crafted - if that's the word - by bureaucrats who have never hired a worker, met a payroll or developed a business plan in their entire lives ... and these businesses are supposed to answer Obama's battle cry for hiring and economic growth?
What will the tax rate on small businessmen be next year? The great government-educated dumb masses may not understand this, but businessmen certainly do ... that their business income is going to be reported on their personal income tax return next year .. and that if that business income exceeds $200,000 they're going to be hit with new taxes. How much? Nearly 5 percent? That's right folks ... according to numbers from our own wonderful Imperial Federal Government, over 50% of the income that will be hit with Obama's tax increase on the evil, filthy rich will be BUSINESS income. That's not even mentioning increases in dividend and interest taxes. Let's hold a job fair!
I never imagined it could be this bad. I knew Obama was a radical. I saw the American votes falling for his wonderfully-crafted speeches and mindless slogans. I actually felt the Republicans deserved some comeuppance for their performance after the 1994 revolution and for putting John McCain instead of someone like Mitt Romney at the head of the ticket ... but Lord help us, I never suspected this guy could be quite THIS bad.
Costa Rica anyone? Panama? New Zealand? Does it come to the point that we leave this idiot to the voters who put him in power? I guess we'll know a lot more on November 3rd.
.................Neal Boortz
.
Sorry ... but I'm really getting sick of this nonsense and the narcissistic boob that's spouting this crap from the Rose Garden. That's right .. notify the Soros myrmidons at Media Matters. I just referred to Obama the Obtuse as a "narcissistic boob." I've had it. I'm fed up. I still have enormous respect for the office of the presidency .. but absolutely none - not one stitch - for the self-involved incompetent and corrupt person who holds that office now ... courtesy of millions of voters who glom on to mindless slogans and a Republican Party that complete squandered a mandate.
Actually ... that "Obama the Obtuse" line, though it sounds clever, isn't quite right. Obama isn't obtuse .. at least now as I understand the word. "Obtuse" means "difficult to understand;" and there is nothing difficult to understand about Obama. He said five days before his coronation that he was going to "fundamentally transform the United States of America," and he meant it. He had every intention of transforming the United States from a nation where people seek self reliance to a nation where the masses seek government-provided security; From a nation with a dynamic free market economy to a clone of the European-Socialist welfare state; from a nation where the majority worship God to a nation where the people worship, as Obama does, the God of Government.
Oh yeah .. Obama is going to launch his "full-scale attack" to get the economy back on its feet. Don't the dumb masses understand that Obama launched his attack 19 months ago?
Obama says that his administration is "hard at work" looking for new ways to promote economic growth. Sure he is. Any work he's doing to find a way to promote economic growth pales to the effort he puts in every day of his life to promote government growth.
Perhaps you've heard the sound bites from yesterday. Obama has this grand new bill he wants the Republicans to support that is supposed to really get things hopping again. What does the bill entail? More government spending, that's what! Basically it's a small business lending bill ... government backed and subsidized lending. He says the GOP has been blockading the bill. Did he happen to mention that the Senate Democrats absolutely refuse to allow the Republicans to propose any amendments to the bill? Look! The Democrats have a majority in the Senate! Let the Republicans propose their amendments, then vote them down! There's your blockade ... but somehow that's just fine with Obama. He preached all this bi-partisanship stuff when he was running for president ... but never meant a word of it.
Lending to small businesses? Is Obama trying to tell us that there's no available money to loan to small businesses right now? Let him explain why small banks are sitting on one trillion dollars in excess reserves right now .. but somehow don't want to put that money into the lending marketplace? Wait --- I'll tell you. He doesn't know. You could take what Obama knows about small business and the mindset of the people who own them and shove up an ant's ass and it would rattle around like a marble in the Super Dome.
These small banks aren't lending right now because they have no confidence that the small businesses they might loan their excess reserves to will be able to pay the back. Simple as that. These business owners are under assault. There's ObamaCare, the financial reform act, tax increases, card check and the empowerment of unions, Cap and Trade ... as my father (a red-ass Marine if there ever was one) would say, these small businesses don't know whether to $h1t or go blind right now ... they are no more in a mood to borrow for expansion than the banks are to loan them money.
Do you know what small business owners - the principal job creators in our economy - talk about over their morning coffee? They're laughing their butts off at Obama's promise to eliminate their capital gains taxes. Hell ... most of them; the vast majority of them don't PAY capital gains taxes! What does it matter to them if capital gains taxes are eliminated? This is like telling hookers you're going to eliminate their unemployment insurance taxes. Oh yeah ... that ought to bring down the price of a little tang in a big way.
Now I may concede the point to you that Obama really does want to do what he can to get the economy moving right now .. but that's only because there's an election on the horizon and he's afraid of losing his support structure on Capitol Hill. There's two problems though:
(a) President ME has no clue HOW to get the economy moving again. He has no understanding of the workings of a small business. None. Same goes for his team of advisors. Obama's Cabinet has the lowest degree of private sector involvement in the past 100 years.Don't you get it folks? The reason we're in this mess is that Mr. Hopey Changey has ALREADY launched his full-scale attack. It's an attack on producers; an attack on achievers; an attack on economic liberty and an attack on the rule of law and our very Constitution. His attack on the private sector has managed to keep businesses, lenders and investors in a state of uncertainty. Consumers don't want to spend. They know his promise not to raise their taxes was another ObamaLie ... and they just don't know how much of their work product they'll even be able to keep after the end of the year. These people are scared to death! They saw Obama ram through a health care bill that clearly the public did not want ... a health care bill that adds to our health care and increases our deficit. Is this supposed to put them in a spending mood? Business leaders have no idea how much of their earnings are going to be seized in the form of taxes or ObamaCare penalties in the coming years. This is supposed to put them in a hiring mood?
(b) Even if President Wonderful DID know what to do, he would probably balk because his anti-capitalist agenda is more important than poor saps who probably didn't vote for him anyway finding a job.
Right now we have dozens of federal agencies that are working on more than 120 new rule-makings under ObamaCare and the wonderful financial overhaul bill. Businessmen have no idea what those new rules and regulations will entail. They've found out about the 1099 reporting debacle under ObamaCare. What's next? The rules aren't even written yet, and when they are written they will be crafted - if that's the word - by bureaucrats who have never hired a worker, met a payroll or developed a business plan in their entire lives ... and these businesses are supposed to answer Obama's battle cry for hiring and economic growth?
What will the tax rate on small businessmen be next year? The great government-educated dumb masses may not understand this, but businessmen certainly do ... that their business income is going to be reported on their personal income tax return next year .. and that if that business income exceeds $200,000 they're going to be hit with new taxes. How much? Nearly 5 percent? That's right folks ... according to numbers from our own wonderful Imperial Federal Government, over 50% of the income that will be hit with Obama's tax increase on the evil, filthy rich will be BUSINESS income. That's not even mentioning increases in dividend and interest taxes. Let's hold a job fair!
I never imagined it could be this bad. I knew Obama was a radical. I saw the American votes falling for his wonderfully-crafted speeches and mindless slogans. I actually felt the Republicans deserved some comeuppance for their performance after the 1994 revolution and for putting John McCain instead of someone like Mitt Romney at the head of the ticket ... but Lord help us, I never suspected this guy could be quite THIS bad.
Costa Rica anyone? Panama? New Zealand? Does it come to the point that we leave this idiot to the voters who put him in power? I guess we'll know a lot more on November 3rd.
.................Neal Boortz
.
Monday, August 16, 2010
THE COMPULSIVE LIAR STRIKES AGAIN. WHO VOTED FOR THIS JERK?
No fact checking here by the media. They just believe everything that spews out of this liar's mouth!
Does he even know the difference between truth and fabrication?
Does he even know the difference between truth and fabrication?
Were there no reporters who double checked these statements and called the party on this?
They did for everyone else. Why not him?
Barack Hussein Obama Sr. (Obama's father)
Born 4/4/36
Died 11/24/82 at the age of 46
He was 5 years old when WW 2 started, and less than 9.5 years old when it ended.
Lolo Soetoro (Obama's step father)
Born 1935
Died 3/2/87 at the age of 52
He was 6 years old when WW 2 started, and 10 years old when it ended.
One of these guys must have been the youngest Veteran in the war.
Watch the video.
WHAT A LIAR!!!! And the media doesn't say anything.
If you doubt it, Google both of these guys.
.
Sunday, August 15, 2010
WALKING EAGLE
| BARACK OBAMA was invited to address a major gathering of the American Indian Nation in upstate New York . He spoke for almost an hour about his plans for increasing every Native American’s present standard of living. He referred to his time as a U.S. Senator and how he had voted for every Native American issue that came to the floor of the Senate. Although President Obama was vague about the details of his plans, he seemed most enthusiastic and spoke eloquently about his ideas for helping his “red sisters and brothers.” At the conclusion of his speech, the Tribes presented Obama with a plaque inscribed with his new Indian name, “Walking Eagle.” The LIAR-IN-CHIEF then departed in his motorcade to a fundraiser, waving to the crowds. A news reporter later asked the group of chiefs how they came to select the new name they had given to the President. They explained that “Walking Eagle” is the name given to a bird so full of shit it can no longer fly. . |
Thursday, July 22, 2010
HOW OBAMA IN ONLY 18 MONTHS PROVED THAT HE IS DUMBER THAN BUSH...and all other Presidents including Jimmy Carter
Very interesting article by BLACK columnist Deroy Murdock showing how the Idiot-in-Chief has embarrassed himself...and our country! He may be slick, but he is also very stupid.
http://article.nationalreview.com/438405/a-year-and-a-half-of-president-obama/deroy-murdock?page=3
.
http://article.nationalreview.com/438405/a-year-and-a-half-of-president-obama/deroy-murdock?page=3
.
Wednesday, July 14, 2010
Liar-in-Chief Promotes His Economic Fantasy...
...while the reality of his efforts is killing the country. WHAT A TWO-FACED HYPOCRITE!
Obama is pro-growth (of government)
Examiner Editorial
July 11, 2010
President Obama and his top officials embarked on a public relations blitz last past week evidently designed to portray him as "pro growth." All such political PR pushes tend to bear tenuous relationships with reality, but in this case the gulf between the truth and what the politicians are saying is about as wide as the Grand Canyon. Say what he will, Obama's actions since his first day in office have made clear that his business is growing government. On all three basic measures of the size of government -- work force, spending, and taxes -- Obama has stimulated tremendous growth.
Take employment. In the private sector, unemployment stays stubbornly near 10 percent. Obama promised his $859 billion stimulus program would keep private sector unemployment below 8 percent, but his failure to reverse the direction of the economy on this score has been so dismal that he is now left to plead with audiences to remember that "it could be 12, 13 or even 15 percent." The president might as well have conjectured a 20, 22 or 25 percent unemployment rate; it would still just be conjecture. What is real is that, while the jobless rate rises or falls slightly from week to week, there are 7.9 million fewer working Americans today than there were in December 2007.
The story for public sector employment, however, is quite the opposite. At 4.4 percent, the unemployment rate among government workers is almost exactly half that of the private sector. But the insulation of government workers from the market realities that private sector workers face is far from the whole story. The federal work force is expanding, not contracting, thanks to Obama initiatives like a health care program that adds 16,000 new Internal Revenue Service enforcers to ensure compliance with the individual mandate. Between December 2008 and December 2009, the federal government added nearly 100,000 new positions.
And being a government worker in the Obama era can be quite lucrative, too. According to data obtained by the Asbury Park Press via a Freedom of Information Act request, last year, 1.3 million federal employees received bonuses totaling $408 million, up $80 million over 2008. Complete data for the remaining federal workers was not available, but in 2008, the Department of Defense gave $92 million in bonuses to its 687,000 civilian employees. On the salary side, the average annual federal salary is now just under $120,000, compared with $59,909 for the private sector, according to the Census Bureau of Economic Analysis. It is cold comfort to millions of unemployed Americans to hear Obama say he is pro-growth.
Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/Obama-is-pro-growth-_of-government_-98138724.html#ixzz0tfRlsFrW
.
Obama is pro-growth (of government)
Examiner Editorial
July 11, 2010
President Obama and his top officials embarked on a public relations blitz last past week evidently designed to portray him as "pro growth." All such political PR pushes tend to bear tenuous relationships with reality, but in this case the gulf between the truth and what the politicians are saying is about as wide as the Grand Canyon. Say what he will, Obama's actions since his first day in office have made clear that his business is growing government. On all three basic measures of the size of government -- work force, spending, and taxes -- Obama has stimulated tremendous growth.
Take employment. In the private sector, unemployment stays stubbornly near 10 percent. Obama promised his $859 billion stimulus program would keep private sector unemployment below 8 percent, but his failure to reverse the direction of the economy on this score has been so dismal that he is now left to plead with audiences to remember that "it could be 12, 13 or even 15 percent." The president might as well have conjectured a 20, 22 or 25 percent unemployment rate; it would still just be conjecture. What is real is that, while the jobless rate rises or falls slightly from week to week, there are 7.9 million fewer working Americans today than there were in December 2007.
The story for public sector employment, however, is quite the opposite. At 4.4 percent, the unemployment rate among government workers is almost exactly half that of the private sector. But the insulation of government workers from the market realities that private sector workers face is far from the whole story. The federal work force is expanding, not contracting, thanks to Obama initiatives like a health care program that adds 16,000 new Internal Revenue Service enforcers to ensure compliance with the individual mandate. Between December 2008 and December 2009, the federal government added nearly 100,000 new positions.
And being a government worker in the Obama era can be quite lucrative, too. According to data obtained by the Asbury Park Press via a Freedom of Information Act request, last year, 1.3 million federal employees received bonuses totaling $408 million, up $80 million over 2008. Complete data for the remaining federal workers was not available, but in 2008, the Department of Defense gave $92 million in bonuses to its 687,000 civilian employees. On the salary side, the average annual federal salary is now just under $120,000, compared with $59,909 for the private sector, according to the Census Bureau of Economic Analysis. It is cold comfort to millions of unemployed Americans to hear Obama say he is pro-growth.
Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/Obama-is-pro-growth-_of-government_-98138724.html#ixzz0tfRlsFrW
.
Friday, July 9, 2010
RUSSIAN SPIES WERE TOO LATE ANYWAY IN TRYING TO DESTROY OUR COUNTRY
With his only experience being as a "community organizer" in Chicago, much of the reality of the dangerous world we live in is lost on this president.
The world is full of people and countries who want nothing more than the total destruction of America and her way of life. Having a president who is inexperienced, weak, naive, too egotistical to know what he doesn't know, and who constantly projects a disdain for his own country to the rest of the world, is a clear and present danger for us all. We ignore it at our peril. Obama would do well to remember that eternal vigilance is the price of freedom.
If the Russians want to destroy America, they best hurry before this administration beats them to the punch.
.
Friday, July 2, 2010
AMNESTY FOR ILLEGAL MEXICAN ALIENS (...err, I mean "undocumented Democrat voters")...ARE YOU KIDDING ME?
On June 30th, the Liar-in-Chief gave a speech at a Town Hall Meeting in Racine, WI, during which he told so many lies that I could spend the entire 4th of July weekend refuting them. I thought to myself as he was spouting off his bullshit as to why the people sitting there...obviously ObamaZombies.. didn't get up and leave as a form of silent protest over the crap he was shoveling out. Were they that Stupid? (they must've been)
But I digress! Today I just want to focus on his promotional ideology for general amnesty and his statement that "...the borders today are safer than ever before." Oh, please! Gag me with the Peace Prize! For instance, the New York Times reports today (TODAY) that nearly two dozen people were killed in a Mexican border area on Thursday during a fierce gun battle between suspected members of rival drug gangs. KILLED! Oh yeah, the border is much safer now.
In her column today, Michelle Malkin reports that the Founding Fathers were emphatically insistent on protecting the country against indiscriminate mass immigration. They insisted on assimilation as a pre-condition, not an afterthought.
Historian John Fonte assembled their wisdom, and it bears repeating this Independence Day weekend:
George Washington, in a letter to John Adams, stated that immigrants should be absorbed into American life so that "by an intermixture with our people, they, or their descendants, get assimilated to our customs, measures, laws: in a word soon become one people."
In a 1790 speech to Congress on the naturalization of immigrants, James Madison stated that America should welcome the immigrant who could assimilate, but exclude the immigrant who could not readily "incorporate himself into our society."
Alexander Hamilton wrote in 1802: "The safety of a republic depends essentially on the energy of a common national sentiment; on a uniformity of principles and habits; on the exemption of the citizens from foreign bias and prejudice; and on that love of country which will almost invariably be found to be closely connected with birth, education and family."
Hamilton further warned that "The United States have already felt the evils of incorporating a large number of foreigners into their national mass; by promoting in different classes different predilections in favor of particular foreign nations, and antipathies against others, it has served very much to divide the community and to distract our councils. It has been often likely to compromise the interests of our own country in favor of another. The permanent effect of such a policy will be, that in times of great public danger there will be always a numerous body of men, of whom there may be just grounds of distrust; the suspicion alone will weaken the strength of the nation, but their force may be actually employed in assisting an invader."
The survival of the American republic, Hamilton maintained, depends upon "the preservation of a national spirit and a national character." "To admit foreigners indiscriminately to the rights of citizens the moment they put foot in our country would be nothing less than to admit the Grecian horse into the citadel of our liberty and sovereignty."
_As pro-amnesty extremists moan that "we didn't cross the borders, the borders crossed us" and illegal alien marchers haul foreign flags above Old Glory, President Obama pretends that the "common national sentiment" our Founding Fathers embraced still binds us all together. Many of us still have faith in a strong, sovereign America -- the unhyphenated, the law-abiding, the gratitude-filled sons and daughters and grandchildren of legal immigrants for whom such distinctions still matter. But it's no thanks to the assimilation saboteurs who put "one world" over "one nation under God."
GENERAL AMNESTY FOR ILLEGAL MEXICAN ALIENS (...err, I mean "undocumented Democrat voters")...ARE YOU KIDDING ME???? DOESN'T ANYBODY EVER WATCH "GANGLAND" ON THE HISTORY CHANNEL?
AND WHY ISN'T ANYONE LISTENING TO THE WISDOM OF OUR FOUNDING FATHERS??? I believe its because Obama and his Democratic minions are willing to sell out our country to maintain their political power over American citizens.
FIGHT BACK, AMERICA....DON'T LET THIS HAPPEN!
.
But I digress! Today I just want to focus on his promotional ideology for general amnesty and his statement that "...the borders today are safer than ever before." Oh, please! Gag me with the Peace Prize! For instance, the New York Times reports today (TODAY) that nearly two dozen people were killed in a Mexican border area on Thursday during a fierce gun battle between suspected members of rival drug gangs. KILLED! Oh yeah, the border is much safer now.
In her column today, Michelle Malkin reports that the Founding Fathers were emphatically insistent on protecting the country against indiscriminate mass immigration. They insisted on assimilation as a pre-condition, not an afterthought.
Historian John Fonte assembled their wisdom, and it bears repeating this Independence Day weekend:
George Washington, in a letter to John Adams, stated that immigrants should be absorbed into American life so that "by an intermixture with our people, they, or their descendants, get assimilated to our customs, measures, laws: in a word soon become one people."
In a 1790 speech to Congress on the naturalization of immigrants, James Madison stated that America should welcome the immigrant who could assimilate, but exclude the immigrant who could not readily "incorporate himself into our society."
Alexander Hamilton wrote in 1802: "The safety of a republic depends essentially on the energy of a common national sentiment; on a uniformity of principles and habits; on the exemption of the citizens from foreign bias and prejudice; and on that love of country which will almost invariably be found to be closely connected with birth, education and family."
Hamilton further warned that "The United States have already felt the evils of incorporating a large number of foreigners into their national mass; by promoting in different classes different predilections in favor of particular foreign nations, and antipathies against others, it has served very much to divide the community and to distract our councils. It has been often likely to compromise the interests of our own country in favor of another. The permanent effect of such a policy will be, that in times of great public danger there will be always a numerous body of men, of whom there may be just grounds of distrust; the suspicion alone will weaken the strength of the nation, but their force may be actually employed in assisting an invader."
The survival of the American republic, Hamilton maintained, depends upon "the preservation of a national spirit and a national character." "To admit foreigners indiscriminately to the rights of citizens the moment they put foot in our country would be nothing less than to admit the Grecian horse into the citadel of our liberty and sovereignty."
_As pro-amnesty extremists moan that "we didn't cross the borders, the borders crossed us" and illegal alien marchers haul foreign flags above Old Glory, President Obama pretends that the "common national sentiment" our Founding Fathers embraced still binds us all together. Many of us still have faith in a strong, sovereign America -- the unhyphenated, the law-abiding, the gratitude-filled sons and daughters and grandchildren of legal immigrants for whom such distinctions still matter. But it's no thanks to the assimilation saboteurs who put "one world" over "one nation under God."
GENERAL AMNESTY FOR ILLEGAL MEXICAN ALIENS (...err, I mean "undocumented Democrat voters")...ARE YOU KIDDING ME???? DOESN'T ANYBODY EVER WATCH "GANGLAND" ON THE HISTORY CHANNEL?
AND WHY ISN'T ANYONE LISTENING TO THE WISDOM OF OUR FOUNDING FATHERS??? I believe its because Obama and his Democratic minions are willing to sell out our country to maintain their political power over American citizens.
FIGHT BACK, AMERICA....DON'T LET THIS HAPPEN!
.
Monday, May 3, 2010
Friday, March 26, 2010
DEMOCRATS DIVERSION TACTICS TO AVOID THE REAL ISSUES
All of sudden all talk by the dumbassocrats has shifted from healthcare to the despicable actions of anti-healthcare tea potters. They have accused these legitimate protesters of spitting on them, calling them derogatory names, blowing up their homes and offices, and sending them threatening emails and telephone calls.
According to Neal Boortz the last thing the ObamaZombies want to do is debate ObamaCare on its merits:
This is just a lot of liberal hooey; it is right out of the socialists handbook for taking over our country. It is "DIVERSION" with a capital "D." I hope none of you are swallowing this line of BS.
.
According to Neal Boortz the last thing the ObamaZombies want to do is debate ObamaCare on its merits:
- They don't want to have to defend the revelation that Obama and his family will not be subject to the restrictions, requirements and penalties of ObamaCare.
- They don't want to have to explain how an insurance company can charge lower premiums when its healthier policy holders take a hike and they're forced to insure people who are already sick.
- They don't want a discussion on how our children and grandchildren are going to pay off the massive debt they will have to overcome courtesy of ObamaCare.
- They don't want to have to defend the gimmicks they used to force the Congressional Budget Office to falsely report that ObamaCare would reduce the deficit.
- They don't want to discuss the logic of fining a young person 2.2% of their income if they refuse to buy an insurance policy they think they won't need that would cost them 10% of their income.
- They don't want to have to explain just why ObamaCare will not follow the path of Medicare and the prescription drug benefit ... the path to actual costs over and above projected costs by a factor of 10 or more.
- They don't want to discuss Fidel Castro's glowing endorsement of ObamaCare yesterday.
- They don't want to discuss just why Democrats absolutely refused to consider simple and easily enforced private sector options, such as allowing insurance companies to sell their policies across state lines, before moving toward healthcare nationalization.
- They don't want to explain just where in the Constitution they found that nifty little clause that gives the government the authority to use its police power to force a free American citizen to enter into a contract to purchase something from a private company against their will.
- They don't want to have to explain why Caterpillar has already announced that as many as 1000 workers will lose their jobs after the passage of ObamaCare.
This is just a lot of liberal hooey; it is right out of the socialists handbook for taking over our country. It is "DIVERSION" with a capital "D." I hope none of you are swallowing this line of BS.
.
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
THE OBAMA, DEMOCRAT, UNION CABAL EXPOSED
According to Neal Boortz, it's no secret that the labor unions are disappointed with Barack Obama and the Democrats. One of the many reasons is because of their failure to pass the Unionization-by-intimidation (card check) legislation. But even if the Obama administration can't deliver on card check, they will find a way to appease the unions. After all ... Obama and the Democrats know who got them elected.
Ever heard of something called the National Mediation Board? It's a three-member panel established during the days of FDR. It was originally created in order to mediate labor-management disputes in the railroad industry. But like any good government creation, it grew. Its powers grew. Its regulatory purview expanded. As this board currently stands, two of the three members are former union officials.
So now the Obama administration is apparently pushing for new arbitration rules. These rules would help unions to gain a representation certificate so long as it wins any representation election. It doesn't have to be an vote of all the workers ... just some small group will do. Here's how the National Right to Work Foundation describes it ...
"The new procedure would stack the deck in favor of unionization by granting a union monopoly bargaining power over workers if the union 'wins' an election, no matter how few eligible workers actually participate in the vote. In fact, this means that a small bloc of workers could force union boss 'representation' on the whole group as opposed to a true majority of all workers deciding for themselves."
.
Ever heard of something called the National Mediation Board? It's a three-member panel established during the days of FDR. It was originally created in order to mediate labor-management disputes in the railroad industry. But like any good government creation, it grew. Its powers grew. Its regulatory purview expanded. As this board currently stands, two of the three members are former union officials.
So now the Obama administration is apparently pushing for new arbitration rules. These rules would help unions to gain a representation certificate so long as it wins any representation election. It doesn't have to be an vote of all the workers ... just some small group will do. Here's how the National Right to Work Foundation describes it ...
"The new procedure would stack the deck in favor of unionization by granting a union monopoly bargaining power over workers if the union 'wins' an election, no matter how few eligible workers actually participate in the vote. In fact, this means that a small bloc of workers could force union boss 'representation' on the whole group as opposed to a true majority of all workers deciding for themselves."
.
Thursday, February 18, 2010
The Government Education Monopoly...more BO lies exposed
According to John Stossel, those who support the current system of government education often point to programs like Head Start. Isn’t that something the government does well? Politicians love it. Hillary Clinton called Head Start “such an extraordinary success."
And so you've spent 166 billion dollars funding 45 years of head start classes. But now the Department of Health and Human Services has done another study of the results. This study was well-designed: several thousand kids applied for Head Start, but then, for the purposes of the study, half were randomly rejected from the program. The DHHS then followed the kids over the next two years.
What did they find? As CATO education expert Andrew Coulson summarizes:
Not a single one of the 114 tests administered to first graders -- of academics, socio-emotional development, health care/health status and parenting practice -- showed a reliable, statistically significant effect from participating in Head Start.
Even the DHHS admits, " the Head Start children and the control group children were at the same level on many of the measures studied."
166 billion of your dollars have made...no difference. Remember the president's promise?
Obama: "We've got to eliminate programs that don't work, and we're doing that." (3/26/2009)
Obama: "Eliminating programs that don't work to make room for ones that do." (2/23/2009)
So, since a government study found head start doesn’t have lasting effects, You might assume the program would be eliminated. Or at least cut back. But no. The study has hardly received any attention, and get this: The budget Obama just proposed would *increase* head start spending by a billion dollars.
THIS MOPE OF A PRESIDENT LIES SO MUCH THAT HE CAN'T KEEP HIS STORIES STRAIGHT ANY MORE!
.
Thursday, February 4, 2010
STATE OF THE UNION LECTURE
Ron Hart, the political humorist, author and columnist, has a great opening paragraph in today's column. He said:
"President Obama made his State of the Union speech/lecture last week, opening with the obligatory, “I am happy to report that the state of our Union is strong.” As any entertainer will tell you, it is smart to start with a good joke."
He further went on to say: "The speech was classic teleprompter Obama: arrogant, dismissive, patronizing, and uncontaminated by any sense of reality. I felt like I was listening to a high school principal who calls the students together after a troubling event in the parking lot — lecturing, casting aspersions, and implying that he knows who did it. Obama’s speech was full of scold and scorn, with none directed toward himself."
As I stated in previous postings, I'm sick and fed up with his "lecturing" us on the outrageous spending that he and his congress are burdening our future generations with. Based on his budget proposal, the average households share of the national debt will soar to $75,000! And he should stop his lies and blaming Bush for this financial disaster. As I said before, only congress is authorized to spend money, and democrats controlled congress all of 2007, 08 and '09 when the deficit soared from $162 Billion when Bush left office to $1.4 Trillion now (10x as much) under BO and his administration.
SO HOW LONG IS HE GOING TO GET AWAY WITH THIS DECEIT AND LYING? WHEN IS THE MEDIA GOING TO START CALLING HIM OUT ON THESE LIES...AND HIS RECKLESS SPENDING PROPOSALS?
Everytime he opens his mouth and lies to us, he leads us to believe he is fiscally conservative and is curbing congressional spending. But then he turns around and does just the opposite. HE IS A SMOOTHLY POLISHED LIAR WHO IS STILL FOOLING A MAJORITY OF THE SIMPLE MINDED POPULACE. BUT IN REALITY HE IS CRAPPING ON US AND LEADING US DOWN THE "ROAD TO SERFDOM!"
Read Ron Hart's entire column at: www.ronhart.com
.
"President Obama made his State of the Union speech/lecture last week, opening with the obligatory, “I am happy to report that the state of our Union is strong.” As any entertainer will tell you, it is smart to start with a good joke."
He further went on to say: "The speech was classic teleprompter Obama: arrogant, dismissive, patronizing, and uncontaminated by any sense of reality. I felt like I was listening to a high school principal who calls the students together after a troubling event in the parking lot — lecturing, casting aspersions, and implying that he knows who did it. Obama’s speech was full of scold and scorn, with none directed toward himself."
As I stated in previous postings, I'm sick and fed up with his "lecturing" us on the outrageous spending that he and his congress are burdening our future generations with. Based on his budget proposal, the average households share of the national debt will soar to $75,000! And he should stop his lies and blaming Bush for this financial disaster. As I said before, only congress is authorized to spend money, and democrats controlled congress all of 2007, 08 and '09 when the deficit soared from $162 Billion when Bush left office to $1.4 Trillion now (10x as much) under BO and his administration.
SO HOW LONG IS HE GOING TO GET AWAY WITH THIS DECEIT AND LYING? WHEN IS THE MEDIA GOING TO START CALLING HIM OUT ON THESE LIES...AND HIS RECKLESS SPENDING PROPOSALS?
Everytime he opens his mouth and lies to us, he leads us to believe he is fiscally conservative and is curbing congressional spending. But then he turns around and does just the opposite. HE IS A SMOOTHLY POLISHED LIAR WHO IS STILL FOOLING A MAJORITY OF THE SIMPLE MINDED POPULACE. BUT IN REALITY HE IS CRAPPING ON US AND LEADING US DOWN THE "ROAD TO SERFDOM!"
Read Ron Hart's entire column at: www.ronhart.com
.
Monday, January 25, 2010
WHAT A GREAT WEEK IT WAS FOR CONSERVATIVES!
Last week was one of the greatest weeks in my political watch-dogging career ever since the Liar-in-Chief got himself elected by fooling millions of addle-brained optimists with his "Change we can believe in" lies. Now after his first year in office will be the new topic of revisionist history, we discover that we really didn't listen carefully enough. What he was really saying to those morons who were fooled by him was: "CHAINS WE CAN BELIEVE IN!"
Here's the sequence of events that led to last week being so great:
1. Massachusetts goes Republican, and elects Scott Brown to fill fat-head Kennedy's fat-ass seat (let's call this a belated fitting tribute to Mary Jo Kopechne).
2. This then hammers a death blow to BO's plans for control over our lives by seriously crippling the union-crafted health care plan.
3. Next, the Supreme Court unshackles the First Amendment and lets corporations free themselves of the limitations imposed on them regarding their political contributions. Now George Soros, lawyers and unions will no longer have a monopoly on political campaign funding.
4. Then, as a bonus, late in the week, stupid Air America, the liberal talk show of the stupid liberal elitists, went out of business - which is probably a redundancy because nobody was listening to it anyway.
Finally, thinking back on the week, BO did not win any awards or peace prizes for his "intentions" and I don't recall that he told any significant lies. NO LIES! NOW THAT IS REALLY HARD TO IMAGINE. (I;m sure he'll make up for it in next weeks State of the Union address).
Oh yeah....and the Colts and Saints both won their championships. GO SAINTS!
.
Here's the sequence of events that led to last week being so great:
1. Massachusetts goes Republican, and elects Scott Brown to fill fat-head Kennedy's fat-ass seat (let's call this a belated fitting tribute to Mary Jo Kopechne).
2. This then hammers a death blow to BO's plans for control over our lives by seriously crippling the union-crafted health care plan.
3. Next, the Supreme Court unshackles the First Amendment and lets corporations free themselves of the limitations imposed on them regarding their political contributions. Now George Soros, lawyers and unions will no longer have a monopoly on political campaign funding.
4. Then, as a bonus, late in the week, stupid Air America, the liberal talk show of the stupid liberal elitists, went out of business - which is probably a redundancy because nobody was listening to it anyway.
Finally, thinking back on the week, BO did not win any awards or peace prizes for his "intentions" and I don't recall that he told any significant lies. NO LIES! NOW THAT IS REALLY HARD TO IMAGINE. (I;m sure he'll make up for it in next weeks State of the Union address).
.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)