ABC, NBC and CBS PROP UP OBAMACARE WITH BLATANT PROPAGANDA

You'd never know that sixty-six percent of Americans disapprove of ObamaCare if you watched the liberal media!

 Even as this horrendous healthcare law destroys jobs, increases our national debt and kicks more than 6 million Americans off of their current healthcare plans, the media prop up the president's signature healthcare law; this is disgraceful, blatant propaganda, and it must be stopped!

 When the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office reported that ObamaCare will cause more than two million Americans to reduce their work hours or leave the workforce altogether, all three major networks (ABC, NBC and CBS) echoed the White House talking points that less hours for America workers is a good thing, since workers "are choosing to spend more time with their families." 

Who believes the stupidity of that kind of logic???

 In just 3 months, HealthCare.gov will have spent $52 million of our tax dollars on paid advertising to promote a program that the majority of Americans flat out don't want.  As the Administration institutes another delay in ObamaCare tailored around the November Congressional elections, not a single network evening newscast touched the story.

It's obvious that the liberal media have an agenda: to mend Obamacare's unraveling support, keeping the public in the dark about its damaging impact, and assisting Obama in taking over more control of our lives.

This is not journalism . . . it's left-wing propaganda designed to protect the Obama Administration and impose government-run healthcare on the American people. Take action now to help stop it!  Call or write your Congressmen and urge them to stop these actions; and make sure you vote for conservative candidates to apply better checks and balances to block the Obama agenda.
.

HOW IMPERIAL DICTATOR OBAMA HAS KILLED THE ECONOMY WITH HIS POLICIES

This month marks the fifth anniversary of the Chrysler bankruptcy. President Obama will doubtless mark the occasion by talking about how his intervention saved the auto company. More noteworthy, however, is how the lawlessness of that intervention created tremendous uncertainty, which still chills the economy today.

Todd Zywicki has written an excellent summary of Obama’s actions in the Chrysler bailout.  A shorter version posted in 'The Foundry' goes like this.

Starting under President Bush and continuing under Obama, the federal government used TARP funds to keep Chrysler afloat.  This gave the government effective control over Chrysler. As a result, the Obama administration was able to call the shots when it put Chrysler through bankruptcy.

Under long-established bankruptcy rules, holders of “secured debt” are rightfully owed 100 percent of what they loaned the company.  However, the Administration decided it would not play by those rules.  Instead, it decreed, holders of secured debt would receive only 29 cents on the dollar. Meanwhile, it decreed that the United Auto Workers, which had no secured creditor rights, would get 40 cents on the dollar.

This arrangement knocked the notion of secured debt on its head.  Businesses offer creditors secured debt when they are struggling to maintain their operations. The assurance that they will get paid back first and in whole if the business declares bankruptcy is what makes lenders more to make such a risky loan.  In Chrysler’s case, most of its secured creditors were large financial institutions, but others taking the risk included Indiana state teacher and police pension funds.

When these creditors balked at accepting the Administration’s offer of less than a third of what they were rightfully owed, Obama chastised them publicly, complaining that they refused to make sacrifices and work constructively, and were holding out for “an unjustified taxpayer-funded bailout.” Since most of the financial institutions holding Chrysler secured debt also had accepted TARP funds, they ultimately yielded to White House pressure and the bankruptcy went through on the President’s law-breaking terms.

For businesses and investors, the process was highly disconcerting.  Both need to know that the rule of law will be upheld consistently.  It is the only way they can be certain that contracts and agreements mean anything. When they aren’t sure the law will recognize their rights, they reduce their activities until certainty returns.

When bankruptcy law is undermined, it’s particularly troubling.  Investing in financially challenged companies is especially risky. Investors need to know how much they stand to lose if the investment does go belly up. By undermining bankruptcy law, the Obama administration made it difficult for investors to gauge whether or not they can absorb such high-risk investments.

Five years on, it is clear the uncertainty is not only slowing investments in companies that could go bankrupt. Investors are providing financing to help businesses replace worn-out equipment and conduct other routine functions.  But they have not returned to taking on other types of riskier investments needed to restore economic growth to where it should be.

The lag in investment shows up clearly when comparing the growth of business investment in the current recovery to that after the similarly severe 1982-1983 recession. After the earlier recession ended, business investment was almost 27 percent greater than its pre-recession peak four years into the recovery. Four years following the end of the latest recession, business investment is just 5.5 percent above its pre-recession height.

Some might argue that the Chrysler bankruptcy was a unique situation and is unlikely to happen again. Therefore, it cannot possibly still be impairing the economy. That argument might hold weight if the Obama administration hadn’t continued to exhibit lawless behavior time and time again.  For example, it has unilaterally “amended” the Affordable Care Act 38 times and acted with similar imperiousness on issues ranging from energy to education to welfare policy.

Such behavior signals to businesses and investors that President Obama won’t hesitate to overturn the law again whenever it suits his interests. This has perpetuated the uncertainty originally created by the Chrysler bankruptcy, and there is no sign that it will abate any time soon.

Uncertainty is bound to persist as long as Obama remains in the Oval Office, unless he has a change of heart and openly declares that he will steadfastly abide by the rule of law for the remainder of his presidency. Since that is profoundly unlikely, we are looking at a minimum of three more years of economy-slowing uncertainty.

That is a long time to wait, but such are the consequences of unsettling something as foundational to the economy as the rule of law.
.

TOP 10 REASONS TO VOTE DEMOCRAT IN 2014

TOP 10 REASONS TO VOTE DEMOCRAT IN 2014

Thanks to Allen West for this gem (allenbwest.com)

10. I’ll vote Democrat because I can’t wait for college football season to be delayed or cancelled because the student athletes are union employees.

9. I’ll vote Democrat because I believe oil company’s profits of 4% on a gallon of gas are obscene, but the government taxing the same gallon of gas at 15% isn’t.



8. I’ll vote Democrat because I believe the government will do a better job of spending the money I earn than I would.



7. I’ll vote Democrat because Freedom of Speech is fine as long as nobody is offended by it.



6. I’ll vote Democrat because I’m way too irresponsible to own a gun, and I know that my local police are all I need to protect me from murderers and thieves. I am also thankful that we have a 911 service that get police to your home in order to identify your body after a home invasion.



5. I’ll vote Democrat because I’m not concerned about millions of babies being aborted so long as we keep all death row inmates alive and comfy.



4. I’ll vote Democrat because I think illegal aliens have a right to free health care, education, and Social Security benefits, and we should take away the Social Security from those who paid into it.



3. I’ll vote Democrat because I believe that businesses should NOT be allowed to make profits for themselves. They need to break even and give the rest away to the government for redistribution as the Democrats see fit.



2. I’ll vote Democrat because I believe liberal judges need to rewrite the Constitution every few days to suit some fringe kooks who would never get their agendas past the voters.



And the Number One reason I’ll vote Democrat is:



1. I’ll vote Democrat because I think that it’s better to pay billions for oil to people who hate us, but not drill our own because it might upset some endangered beetle, gopher, fish or frog.

.

DIRECTIONS TO START WORLD WAR III

Start by electing someone not qualified to be the President of the United States. Make sure he is a devout Muslim loyal to his Muslim friends who hate the United States, make sure that illegitimate President selects someone as clueless and incompetent as John Kerry as the Secretary of Defense, and then let a ruthless former KGB thug walk all over him on the world stage.

Ah, I almost forgot. Make sure that person is such an imbecile that despite ALL the evidence to the contrary, he still somehow thinks HE has the upper hand against the KGB thug. Then be sure to fire 250+ of the top military minds of the country if they are not willing to fire on the Tea Party if asked to. When any remaining military minds give suggestions, make sure this same schmuck ignores them all, uses the same brilliance and executive experience never used to run so much as as lemonade stand, and make sure he goes about staying the course with his already proven inept foreign policy ideas. 

When all else fails, be sure to let a rogue nation like Iran go Nuclear, shrink your military because you've destroyed the only remaining super power's economy to afford the military, and then blame it all on income inequality and George Bush.

Any questions?
.