WHAT'S FAIR ABOUT TAXING THE RICH EVEN MORE?

I know you are sick of these figures by now.  I know I am.  But the Libtard Democrats who get their twisted economic facts from Media  Matters, MoveOn.org, The Daily Kos, fat blowhard hypocrite Michael Moore, MSNBC, etc, etc. keep sending me pretty, distorted charts, graphs and tables explaining how the rich aren't paying their fair share and how the great (in his own egocentric mind) Liar-in-Chief is doing such a great job in running (or ruining?) this country, that I am compelled to take the time to spell it out again for their benefit.  So here goes:

 The top 1% of taxpayers earn about 20% of the income but pay about 38% of all revenues.  GOT THAT?  For the top 10% of taxpayers, they pay around 68% of all federal income taxes. GOT THAT?  The bottom 47%  of eligible taxpayers pay nothing.  GOT THAT!  I'll repeat...NOTHING!

Now let’s look back into the history books and see exactly how much those evil rich people have paid in taxes over the years.  These numbers come from Stephen Moore, a senior economics writer for the WSJ editorial board and a policy analyst for the Cato Institute and the Heritage Foundation.  He says ..

    "In the early 1960s, the highest marginal income tax rate was a stunning 91 percent. That top rate fell to 70 percent after the Kennedy-Johnson tax cuts and remained there until 1981. Then Ronald Reagan slashed it to 50 percent and ultimately to 28 percent after the 1986 Tax Reform Act. Although the federal tax rate fell by more than half, total tax receipts in the 1980s doubled from $517 billion in 1981 to $1,030 billion in 1990. The top tax rate rose slightly under George H. W. Bush and then moved to 39.6 percent under Bill Clinton. But under George W. Bush it fell again to 35 percent. So what’s striking is that, even as tax rates have fallen by half over the past quarter-century, taxes paid by the wealthy have increased. Lower tax rates have made the tax system more progressive, not less so. In 1980, for example, the top 5 percent of income earners paid only 37 percent of all income taxes. Today, the top 1 percent pay that proportion, and the top 5 percent pay a whopping 57 percent."

Wow, those rich people sure have been “getting away” with not paying more taxes as the years go by.  Meanwhile, the bottom 47% of our population pay NOTHING!  How is it “fair” for some to pay 38% in federal income taxes while some do not pay anything at all?  So quit whining, Libtards, and start focusing on getting them to start contributing SOMETHING to help the economy.
.

KIDS TELL IT LIKE IT IS

.

This is why our per capita education expenditures far exceed all other countries.

 

.

Why Do African-Americans Keep Voting For Democrats?

At a loss for anything but spending money on unions and government jobs, Obama has no ability to reduce the African-American unemployment rate.  Under Obama, black unemployment hit a 27-year high last week.  And yet Blacks blindly keep voting for Democrats!

Here's a suggestion that Obama can do to help black male unemployment:  Expand the NBA to 5,000 teams.

Thanks to Ron Hart for contributing these thoughts.

###########

DISCLAIMER -- WARNING!    The ad for Obama which may follow this post is no way an endorsement of BO by this Blog.  We have no say as to the content of the advertising inserted herein, and the BO ad is a reflection of the audacity and stupidity of him and his re-election team.
We consider him to be a bigger liar than Clinton, fundamentally dishonest, and crippling to our economy; he has exacerbated racial tensions, inflamed partisan divisiveness, encouraged class warfare and demonized everyone on the right--especially members of the Tea Party Patriots.
,

Obama's Solyndra scandal reeks of the Chicago Way

Thanks to John Kass, Columnist for the Chicago Tribune, for detailing the Solyndra scam in easy to understand terms.  This hits the nail on the head as to how us taxpayers are getting screwed.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/ct-met-kass-0918-20110918,0,6401818,full.column

Those of us from Chicago know exactly what the Solyndra scandal smells like. And It doesn't smell fresh and green.

Obama beams with joy at Solyndra plant knowing that he's gonna stick it to taxpayers again!

John Kass

September 18, 2011

The Solyndra scandal cost at least a half-billion public dollars. It is plaguing President Barack Obama. And it's being billed as a Washington story.


But back in Obama's political hometown, those of us familiar with the Chicago Way can see something else in Solyndra — something that the Washington crowd calls "optics." In fact, it's not just a Washington saga — it has all the elements of a Chicago City Hall story, except with more zeros.


The FBI is investigating what happened with Solyndra, a solar panel company that got a $535 million government-backed loan with the help of the Obama White House over the objections of federal budget analysts.


Obama and Vice President Joe Biden got a nice photo op. They got to make speeches about being "green." But then Solyndra went bankrupt. Americans lost jobs. Taxpayers got stuck with the bill. And members of Congress are now in high dudgeon and making speeches.


Federal investigators want to know what role political fundraising played in the guarantee of the questionable loan. Washington bureaucrats warned the deal was lousy. And White House spokesmen flail desperately, like weakened victims in a cheesy vampire movie.


So forget optics. What about smell? It smells bad, and it's going to smell worse.


Or, did you really believe it when the White House mouthpieces — who are also Chicago City Hall mouthpieces — promised they were bringing a new kind of politics to Washington?


This is not a new kind of politics. It's the old kind. The Chicago kind.


And now the Tribune Washington Bureau has reported that the U.S. Department of Energy employee who helped monitor the Solyndra loan guarantee was one of Obama's top fundraisers.


Fundraising? Contracts? Imagine that.


Steve Spinner was the Obama administration official in charge of handing out billions and billions of tax dollars to "green" energy deals. According to the Tribune story, Spinner the other day invited Obama's national political finance committee to a meeting in Chicago.


The name of the Obama fundraising initiative?


"Technology for Obama."


The idea of the Obama fundraisers getting together, talking "green," and perhaps offering taxpayer loan guarantees to insider businesses in the interest of helping the environment — it all seems rather fresh.


Like a mountain meadow.


Until you realize it's the same old politics, the same kind practiced in Washington and Chicago and anywhere else where appetites are satisfied by politicians. When the government picks winners and losers, who's the loser? Just look in the mirror, hold that thought, and tell me later.


Republicans are hoping to hang this around Obama's political neck, and they're doing a good job of it now because his approval ratings are low and the jobless numbers are abysmal and the Democrats are in full killer-rabbit panic. But there have been Republican national scandals, too, and they're always ridiculously and depressingly similar.


At least in Illinois our scandals are quite ecumenical, with Republicans eager to help Democrats steal whatever they can grab.


In Solyndra, like any proper City Hall political scandal, there are similar archetypes.


There are the guys who count. The guys who bring the cash. They count because they do the counting. They have leverage. They're always there at the fundraisers. And so they're the ones who are allowed to gorge at the public trough.


The bureaucrats are the fulcrum so the guys with the leverage can lift great weight without too much effort. And while they might whine privately among themselves, they don't hold news conferences to blow the whistle.


They keep their mouths shut until the deal is done. If anyone gets caught and the problem becomes public, at least they've got email to cover their behinds. And they're doing a good job covering.


But there's one group that doesn't get their behinds covered.


Instead, their behinds are right out there, suspended foolishly, and waiting to get kicked.


We're the taxpayers — in Illinois we call ourselves chumbolones because we're the ones who stupidly end up covering all the losses. As in the Solyndra mess.


It's the Chicago Way, but instead of a paving or trucking contract, it's a "green" solar panel contract. The company received a $535 million loan.


"The optics of a Solyndra default will be bad," according to a Jan. 31 email from an Office of Management and Budget staffer printed in the Washington Post. "If Solyndra defaults down the road, the optics will arguably be worse later than they would be today. … In addition, the timing will likely coincide with the 2012 campaign season heating up."


I love the use of "optics." It's one of those bloodless words finding favor these days.


"Optics" suggests bureaucrats might think in terms of symbolism, political hieroglyphs, in grand vistas, rather than in hard numbers, like the $535,000,000 that went poof.


But it's not their money, is it? It's ours.


So this is not about Washington optics after all. The Solyndra scandal is about the Washington smell of things.


Those of us from Chicago know exactly what it smells like. And It doesn't smell fresh and green.

###########

DISCLAIMER -- WARNING!    The ad for Obama which may follow this post is no way an endorsement of BO by this Blog.  We have no say as to the content of the advertising inserted herein, and the BO ad is a reflection of the audacity and stupidity of him and his re-election team.
We consider him to be a bigger liar than Clinton, fundamentally dishonest, and crippling to our economy; he has exacerbated racial tensions, inflamed partisan divisiveness, encouraged class warfare and demonized everyone on the right--especially members of the Tea Party Patriots.
.

 

WE SHOULD PASS THE AMERICAN JOBS ACT WITHOUT DELAY!

We should pass the American Jobs Act immediately!  WHAT'S THAT YOU SAY?

Here's why:  Obama presented Congress with his bill on Monday evening.  But apparently no Democrat wanted to file the name of Obama’s bill.  Who can blame them?  Even his own constituents don't want to be associated with this outrageously stupid piece of proposed legislation!

(In my opinion, the name of his bill SHOULD have been The Union Restoration Act, but he wanted something along the lines of The American Jobs Act.)

So since no Democrats bothered to file the name, a certain representative by the name of Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) created his own bill with that name.  Instead of raising taxes like Obama, Gohmert’s bill would reduce the corporate income tax rate to 0% and repeal the alternative minimum tax.  HOW GREAT IS THAT?  But what can we make of the fact that THE STUPID OBAMACRATS (Democrats) didn’t even manage to file Obama’s bill in a timely manner? 

These are the idiots that are running our country, folks!

###########

DISCLAIMER -- WARNING!    The ad for Obama which may follow this post is no way an endorsement of BO by this Blog.  We have no say as to the content of the advertising inserted herein, and the BO ad is a reflection of the audacity and stupidity of him and his re-election team.
We consider him to be a bigger liar than Clinton, fundamentally dishonest, and crippling to our economy; he has exacerbated racial tensions, inflamed partisan divisiveness, encouraged class warfare and demonized everyone on the right--especially members of the Tea Party Patriots.
.

Interesting Article: Put this guy in charge

Put this guy in charge.......... No kidding, this guy has more
smarts than all the people running this country put together !

This article was in the Waco Tribune Herald in Waco , TX on 11/18/10

Put me in charge of food stamps. I'd get rid of Lone Star cards; no cash
for Ding Dongs or Ho Ho's, just money for 50-pound bags of rice and
beans, blocks of cheese and all the powdered milk you can haul away.  If
you want steak and frozen pizza, then get a job.

Put me in charge of Medicaid. The first thing I'd do is to get women
Norplant birth control implants or tubal ligations.  Then, we'll test
recipients for drugs, alcohol, nicotine and document all tattoos and
piercings.  If you want to reproduce or use drugs, alcohol, smoke or get
tats and piercings, then get a job.

Put me in charge of government housing.  Ever live in a military
barracks? You will maintain our property in a clean and good state of
repair.  Your "home" will be subject to inspections anytime and
possessions will be inventoried.  If you want a plasma TV or Xbox 360,
then get a job and your own place.

In addition, you will either present a check stub from a job each week or
you will report to a "government" job.  It may be cleaning the roadways
of trash, painting and repairing public housing, whatever we find for
you.  We will sell your 22 inch rims and low profile tires and your
blasting stereo and speakers and put that money toward the "common good."

Before you write that I've violated someone's rights, realize that all of
the above is voluntary.  If you want our money, accept our rules.  Before
you say that this would be "demeaning" and ruin their "self esteem,"
consider that it wasn't that long ago that taking someone else's money
for doing absolutely nothing was demeaning and lowered self esteem.

If we are expected to pay for other people's mistakes we should at least
attempt to make them learn from their bad choices.  The current system
rewards them for continuing to make mistakes and bad choices.

Alfred W. Evans, Gatesville , TX


AND while you are on Government subsistence, you no longer can VOTE!
Yes, that is correct.  For you to vote would be a conflict of interest.
You will voluntarily remove yourself from the voting rolls while you are
receiving a Government welfare check.  If you want to vote - get a job.

###########

DISCLAIMER -- WARNING!    The ad for Obama which may follow this post is no way an endorsement of BO by this Blog.  We have no say as to the content of the advertising inserted herein, and the BO ad is a reflection of the audacity and stupidity of him and his re-election team.
We consider him to be a bigger liar than Clinton, fundamentally dishonest, and crippling to our economy; he has exacerbated racial tensions, inflamed partisan divisiveness, encouraged class warfare and demonized everyone on the right--especially members of the Tea Party Patriots.
.

What did Presidents Hoover, Truman, and Eisenhower have in common?

All three did what was right for America, not like the multi-cultural liberal policies of political whores crippling the country today.

This is something that should be  of great interest for you to pass around.  I didn't know of this until  it was pointed out to me.

Back during the great depression, Herbert  Hoover ordered the deportation of ALL illegal  aliens in order to make  jobs available to American citizens that desperately needed  work.

Harry Truman deported over two million illegal  aliens after WWII to  create jobs for returning veterans.

In 1954 Dwight  Eisenhower deported 13 million Mexicans.  The program was called  Operation Wetback.  It was done  so WWII and Korean veterans would have  a better chance at
jobs.  It took two years, but they deported  them!

 Operation Wetback was a 1954 operation by the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) to remove illegal immigrants, mostly Mexican nationals from the southwest US.

Now if they could deport the illegal aliens back then,  they could sure do it today.  If you have doubts about the veracity of  this information, enter Operation Wetback into your favorite search engine  and confirm it for yourself.

Why you might ask can't they do  this today?  Actually the answer is quite simple. Hoover , Truman, and Eisenhower were men of  honor who loved their country, not untrustworthy politicians looking for votes!

  Reminder:   Don't forget to pay  your taxes - 12 to 20 million illegal
aliens  - are depending on  you!

###########

DISCLAIMER -- WARNING!    The ad for Obama which may follow this post is no way an endorsement of BO by this Blog.  We have no say as to the content of the advertising inserted herein, and the BO ad is a reflection of the audacity and stupidity of him and his re-election team.
We consider him to be a bigger liar than Clinton, fundamentally dishonest, and crippling to our economy; he has exacerbated racial tensions, inflamed partisan divisiveness, encouraged class warfare and demonized everyone on the right--especially members of the Tea Party Patriots.
.

MSNBC SCORES AGAIN (BIG TIME) IN ITS BIASED COVERAGE OF THE REPUBLICAN DEBATE. WHY DOES ANYBODY WATCH THIS STUPID CHANNEL?

Thanks to Neal Boortz for his accurate reporting on how ridiculous--and stupid--these people are.

For the time that I watched it seemed to me that pretty much every question asked of the candidates were based on some liberal Democrat premise or perspective.  Well … I guess you would expect that.

But wait!  There’s more!

Let’s look at the MSNBC analysis team following the speech.  We had Chris Matthews and Rachael Maddow.  Matthews has a lot of Capitol Hill experience.  He’s a prog – but so what.  I can see him on the MSNBC team.  Maddow?  Have never listened to her and know very little about her.  She’s a vagitarian.  Big deal.  Oh .. and a prog as well.  Again, this is MSNBC.

That brings to Ed Schultz and Al Sharpton.

Schultz?  Are you kidding me?  This man has not one ounce of integrity and has proven himself to be dishonest.  In the past six months he has taken tapes of statements I made on the air and statements that Rick Perry made on the campaign trail – edited the recordings of those statements – and then presented them on the air as genuine; all to change the meaning of what was said by myself and by Perry in order to attack us.  His editing of my statements came first and made no news whatsoever.  When he pulled the same stunt on Perry he was caught.  Now even his most loyal listeners know of his dishonesty and know that they really can’t trust the sound bites he plays on the air.  And MSNBC chooses him as an analyst?  I’m hearing Schultz was dismayed that he didn’t have the chance to do some creative editing on the statements made by the candidates before they began the analysis segment.  Sucked to be him, I guess.

And Al Sharpton?  The man is a proven liar.  How have so many forgotton the Tawana Brawley episode?  This was 24 years ago … but it’s still the same Al Sharpton.  Tawana Brawley said that six men – all white and including some police officers – raped her.  Sharpton quickly signed on as her “advisor” and became a media figure carrying her rape story forward.  A grand jury later found that there was no evidence to back up Brawley’s accusations .. and that she most likely made it appear that she had been attacked and abused by smearing feces on herself, tearing her own clothes, and writing racial obscenities on her body with charcoal.  The theory is that she did this to create an excuse for her four-day absence from her family at the age of 14.  Some witnesses testified that Brawley had been beaten by her mother after previous runaway incidents where she spent time with various boys.  Sharpton was successfully sued (as was Brawley) by one of the men falsely accused of the rape.  Sharpton supporters stepped forward to pay the judgment against him.  So there’s your race pimp Al Sharpton .. and he’s analyzing last night’s GOP debate on MSNBC?  A dishonest lying race pimp like this?  What the hell?

###########

DISCLAIMER -- WARNING!    The ad for Obama which may follow this post is no way an endorsement of BO by this Blog.  We have no say as to the content of the advertising inserted herein, and the BO ad is a reflection of the audacity and stupidity of him and his re-election team.
We consider him to be a bigger liar than Clinton, fundamentally dishonest, and crippling to our economy; he has exacerbated racial tensions, inflamed partisan divisiveness, encouraged class warfare and demonized everyone on the right--especially members of the Tea Party Patriots.
.

THE AMERICAN JOBS ACT: JUST MORE CAMPAIGN RHETORIC FROM THE LIAR-IN-CHIEF

Our Buffoon-in-Chief wants his American Jobs Act passed “right away.”  He told us that at least eight times.  We need to pass this plan and we need to do it right now - by God.  How many times do our Republican leaders fall for this LIAR'S bullcrap?

Why the urgency?  Because when Congress fails to pass it right away, Obama can throw up his hands and say, “Hey, I told them we needed to pass it right away.  Congress didn’t! The Republicans blocked it!  Republican obstructionism and partisanship is destroying our economy.    It’s not my fault.  Our economy would have recovered by now if they had only listened to me.”  And then you will hear that line from now until November 2012.

So here's basically what we were told in Obama’s speech:
  
   Spend about a half-trillion dollars we don’t have.
   Insure that as much of the new spending is spent by the government sector as possible.  Governments spending on roads, bridges and schools.  Keep as much of the spending out of the private sector as we can. (wasn't this what we were told the Stimulus money was for?)
    Make sure that to the greatest extent possible the beneficiaries of the spending are union workers --- teachers, construction workers and the like.
    Tell the dumb masses once again that the evil rich and the nasty corporations are not paying “their fair share” of taxes.
    Get the phrase “millionaires and billionaires” in there at least once to generate a little more class envy.
    Call for the increased spending, but pass the buck on how to come up with the money to the super committee of 12 Senators and Congressmen, that way the Buffoon-in-Chief  doesn’t have to take the heat for the tax increase proposals or spending cuts in next year’s election.

But don't we get three days ( not including weekends and holidays) to read the freak'n bill?  I guess we'll need to sign it to find out whats in it.  That's how these clowns operate!

I expect it will be pretty much the same as the last stimulus wealth transfers, intended merely to take taxpayer money and give it to unions and Obama supporters. Has all of the money from the previous stimuli been accounted for? What about the millions given to people in area codes and congressional districts which do not exist? What about the billions given to government employees who merely divided it up among themselves and called it a bonus? Why should we have any expectation that THIS money will be handled with any more responsibility? I would like to see a full, independent audit of ALL money spent in the first stimulus packages before any more money is given out!

Considering how bad Obama's policies worked in the past couple years, I was really expecting this speech to have lots of either sound economic policies or proposals for major debt reduction.  But nooo! What he gave us was more of the same socialist policies he's been imposing since day 1 that all but the most stubborn Obama voter admits was a horrendous failure. (The ones that won't admit it still acknowledge how bad the policies are but they just won't admit it).

###########

DISCLAIMER -- WARNING!    The ad for Obama which may follow this post is no way an endorsement of BO by this Blog.  We have no say as to the content of the advertising inserted herein, and the BO ad is a reflection of the audacity and stupidity of him and his re-election team.
We consider him to be a bigger liar than Clinton, fundamentally dishonest, and crippling to our economy; he has exacerbated racial tensions, inflamed partisan divisiveness, encouraged class warfare and demonized everyone on the right--especially members of the Tea Party Patriots.
.

TAX DOLLARS BEING USED TO PAY FOR MOSQUES OVERSEAS

As part of a $770,000 program, the Obama administration is sending US tax money overseas to build and maintain Islamic mosques.  Meanwhile, Christianity is being stifled by the same President.

Muslims must be laughing at us all the way to the bank!  Maybe Dumbo ears should pay more attention to his 57 States of America!

So let me get this straight.  We can't support religious institutions in the U.S. but we are sending thousands of dollars to the middle east to support Muslim institutions over there.  WTF!  Hillary Clinton needs to have a camel pull her head out of her ass.

###########

DISCLAIMER -- WARNING!    The ad for Obama which may follow this post is no way an endorsement of BO by this Blog.  We have no say as to the content of the advertising inserted herein, and the BO ad is a reflection of the audacity and stupidity of him and his re-election team.
We consider him to be a bigger liar than Clinton, fundamentally dishonest, and crippling to our economy; he has exacerbated racial tensions, inflamed partisan divisiveness, encouraged class warfare and demonized everyone on the right--especially members of the Tea Party Patriots.
.

ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF HOW IDIOT DEMOCRATS ARE SCREWING UP OUR COUNTRY

Pending Legislation in California: “The Law to Eliminate Employment of Babysitters in the State”

From California State Senator Doug LaMalfa (R-4th District):

"How will California parents react when they find out they will be expected to provide workers' compensation benefits, rest and meal breaks, and paid vacation time for…babysitters? Dinner and a movie night may soon become much more complicated.

California Assembly Bill 889 will require these protections for all “domestic employees,” including nannies, housekeepers and caregivers. The bill has already passed the Assembly and is quickly moving through the Senate with blanket support from the Democrat members that control both houses of the Legislature – and without the support of a single Republican member. Assuming the bill will easily clear its last couple of legislative hurdles, AB 889 will soon be on its way to the Governor's desk.

Under AB 889, household “employers” (aka “parents”) who hire a babysitter on a Friday night will be legally obligated to pay at least minimum wage to any sitter over the age of 18 (unless it is a family member), provide a substitute caregiver every two hours to cover rest and meal breaks, in addition to workers' compensation coverage, overtime pay, and a meticulously calculated timecard/paycheck.

Failure to abide by any of these provisions may result in a legal cause of action against the employer ("parents") including cumulative penalties, attorneys' fees, legal costs and expenses associated with hiring expert witnesses, an unprecedented measure of legal recourse provided no other class of workers – from agricultural laborers to garment manufacturers."

MP: Just one more example of excessive regulation and high labor costs in the "unionocracy of California," giving businesses one more reason to leave the state in record numbers. 

 

###########

DISCLAIMER -- WARNING!    The ad for Obama which may follow this post is no way an endorsement of BO by this Blog.  We have no say as to the content of the advertising inserted herein, and the BO ad is a reflection of the audacity and stupidity of him and his re-election team.
We consider him to be a bigger liar than Clinton, fundamentally dishonest, and crippling to our economy; he has exacerbated racial tensions, inflamed partisan divisiveness, encouraged class warfare and demonized everyone on the right--especially members of the Tea Party Patriots.

.

BARRY THE FLAKE: YOU GOTTA LOVE THIS BOOB IN ACTION

If this were George Bush, the media would never stop airing it!

###########

DISCLAIMER -- WARNING!    The ad for Obama which may follow this post is no way an endorsement of BO by this Blog.  We have no say as to the content of the advertising inserted herein, and the BO ad is a reflection of the audacity and stupidity of him and his re-election team.
We consider him to be a bigger liar than Clinton, fundamentally dishonest, and crippling to our economy; he has exacerbated racial tensions, inflamed partisan divisiveness, encouraged class warfare and demonized everyone on the right--especially members of the Tea Party Patriots.

HEY, OBAMA...IT REALLY DOES MATTER, YOU IDIOT!!!

WHEN he refused to disclose who donated money to his election campaign, as other candidates had done, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN he received endorsements from people like Louis Farrakhan and Moammar Qadaffi and Hugo Chavez, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN it was pointed out that he was a total newcomer and had absolutely no experience at anything except community organizing, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN he chose friends and acquaintances such as Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn who were revolutionary radicals, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN his voting record in the Illinois senate and in the U.S. Senate came into question, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN he refused to wear a flag lapel pin, and did so only after a public outcry, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN people started treating him as a Messiah and children in schools were taught to sing his praises, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN he stood with his hands over his groin area for the playing of the National Anthem and Pledge of Allegiance, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN he surrounded himself in the White house with advisers who were pro-gun control, pro- abortion, pro-homosexual marriage and wanting to curtail freedom of speech to silence the opposition people said it didn't matter..

WHEN he aired his views on abortion, homosexuality and a host of other issues, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN he said he favors sex education in Kindergarten, including homosexual indoctrination, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN his personal background was either scrubbed or hidden and nothing could be found about him, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN the place of his birth was called into question, and he refused to produce a birth certificate, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN he had an association in Chicago with Tony Rezco--a man of questionable character and who is now in prison and had helped Obama to a sweet deal on the purchase of his home-- people said it didn't matter.

WHEN it became known that George Soros, a multi-billionaire Marxist, spent a ton of money to get him elected, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN he started appointing White House Czars that were radicals, revolutionaries, and even avowed Marxist/Communist, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN he stood before the Nation and told us that his intentions were to "fundamentally transform this Nation" into something else, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN it became known that he had trained ACORN workers in Chicago and served as an attorney for ACORN, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN he appointed cabinet members and several advisers who were tax cheats and socialists, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN he appointed a Science Czar, John Holdren, who believes in forced abortions, mass sterilizations and seizing babies from teen mothers, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN he appointed Cass Sunstein as Regulatory Czar who believes in "Explicit Consent," harvesting human organs without family consent, and allowing animals to be represented in court, while banning all hunting, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN he appointed Kevin Jennings, a homosexual, and organizer of a group called gay, lesbian, straight, education network as Safe School Czar and it became known that he had a history of bad advice to teenagers, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN he appointed Mark Lloyd, as Diversity Czar, who believes in curtailing free speech; taking from one and giving to another to spread the wealth; who supports Hugo Chavez, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN Valerie Jarrett was selected as Obama's Senior White House Advisor and she is an avowed Socialist, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN Anita Dunn, White House Communications Director said Mao Tse Tung was her favorite philosopher-- and the person she turned to most for inspiration, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN he appointed Carol Browner as Global Warming Czar, and her being a well known socialist working on Cap and Trade as the nations largest tax, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN he appointed Van Jones, an ex-con and avowed Communist as Green Energy Czar, who since had to resign when this was made known, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN Tom Daschle, Obama's pick for health and human services secretary could not be confirmed, because he was a tax cheat, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN as President of the United States , he bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia , people said it didn't matter.

WHEN he traveled to all 57 states and around the world criticizing America and never once talking of her greatness, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN his actions concerning the Middle-East seemed to support the Palestinians over Israel , our long time ally, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN he took American tax dollars to resettle thousands of Palestinians from Gaza to the United States , people said it didn't matter.

WHEN he upset the Europeans by removing plans for a missile defense system against the Russians, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN he played politics in Afghanistan by not sending troops early-on when the Field Commanders said they were necessary to win, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN he started spending us into a debt that was so big we could not pay it off, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN he took a huge spending bill under the guise of stimulus and used it to pay off organizations, unions, and individuals that got him elected, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN he took over insurance companies, car companies, banks, etc., people said it didn't matter.

WHEN he took away student loans from the banks and put it through the government, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN he designed plans to take over the health care system and put it under government control, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN he claimed he was a Christian during the election and tapes were later made public that showed Obama speaking to a Muslim group and 'stating' that he was raised a Muslim; was educated as a Muslim; and that he is still a Muslim-- people said it didn't matter.

WHEN he set into motion a plan to take over the control of all energy in the United States through Cap and Trade, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN he finally completed his transformation of America into a Socialist State , people finally woke up--- but it was too late.

Add these up one by one and you get a phenomenal score that points to the fact that Barrack Hussein Obama is determined to turn America into a Marxist-Socialist society.

All of the items in the preceding paragraphs have been put into place. All can be documented very easily. Before you disavow this do an internet search. The last paragraph alone is not yet cast in stone.. You and I will write that paragraph. Will it read as above or will it be a more happy ending for most of America ?

If you are an Obama Supporter don't be angry with me because I think Barrack Hussein Obama is a socialist. Far too many facts support he is indeed a Socialist.

If you seek the truth you will be richer for it.

Don't just belittle the opposition.. Search for the truth. Democrats, Republicans, Independents, Constitutionalists, Libertarians all need to pull together or watch the demise of a free democratic society.

Pray for Americans to seek the truth and take action for it will keep us FREE. Our biggest enemy is not China , Russia , North Korea , and Iran. Our biggest enemy is a contingent of politicians in Washington DC . The government will not help, so we need to do it ourselves.

Please pass this on to others who don't know about Obama's actions and plans for the USA , so that they may know how to vote in November, 2012 and the ensuing years?

It's your decision.  I believe it does matter. How about you?

###########

DISCLAIMER -- WARNING!    The ad for Obama which may follow this post is no way an endorsement of BO by this Blog.  We have no say as to the content of the advertising inserted herein, and the BO ad is a reflection of the audacity and stupidity of him and his re-election team.
We consider him to be a bigger liar than Clinton, fundamentally dishonest, and crippling to our economy; he has exacerbated racial tensions, inflamed partisan divisiveness, encouraged class warfare and demonized everyone on the right--especially members of the Tea Party Patriots.

.

EXAMPLES OF WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS COUNTRY

EXAMPLE NO. 1   WASTEFUL GOVERNMENT SPENDING

Beetlemania: Feds Give 4 States $5.8 Million to Protect Insect Habitat
Thursday, August 25, 2011
By Terence P. Jeffrey

(CNSNews.com) - The U.S. Department of Interior announced this week that it is giving four states $5,802,180 in grants for projects that are designed in whole or in part to protect various types of threatened or endangered beetles. 

The largest of these grants is a $2,426,055 award to the state of Maryland to help protect the habitat of the Puritan tiger beetle, a threatened insect that inhabits beaches and bluffs along Chesapeake Bay in Maryland as well as along the Connecticut River in New England.

The $5.8 million in grants that will help four states protect beetles are part of a group of 48 grants totaling $53.3 million that the Interior Department said on Wednesday will go to 17 states to develop conservation plans or purchase or preserve land determined to be habitat for species that have been listed as threatened or endangered under the federal Endangered Species Act.

EXAMPLE NO.2    OUTRAGEOUS UNION PRACTICES

In fiscal 2009, the Postal Service logged over 1.2 million hours in standby time. The U.S. Postal Service, which expects to lose $7 billion this year, spent $4.3 million on employees who did nothing in the first half of the year because of requirements in union agreements, an audit found.  The amount paid for so-called standby time has “significantly decreased,” down tens of millions of dollars from the amount spent just a couple of years ago, says The Washington Post, which obtained a copy of an audit.

Labor agreements mandate that postal employees have a certain amount of guaranteed work hours, which means that they cannot be laid off during periods of low mail volume or unplanned events like the breakdown of equipment. This leads to “standby time,” in which employees spend the day doing nothing — for example, waiting in a cafeteria or breakroom.

In fiscal 2009, the Postal Service logged over 1.2 million hours in standby time, costing the agency more than $30 million. This declined to around $20 million in 2010 and is on track to be less than $10 million this year.  The report explains the decrease in standby time by saying that the employee workforce has been reduced in size over the past two years to more appropriately align with expected workload.  However, auditors found a significant amount of Postal Service officials who did not always record standby time properly, which led to improper overtime charges.

Despite a decline in the number of hours that workers are paid to do nothing, the U.S. Postal Service remains in deep financial trouble. In the recently concluded third quarter of fiscal 2011, the agency lost $3.1 billion. “The growth in electronic communications continues to erode core first-class mail volume,” the Postal Service said in a recent release.

EXAMPLE NO. 3    LAZY STUPID WELFARE DEPENDENT DUMB MASSES



EXAMPLE NO. 4    NEED MORE BE SAID?

 ########

DISCLAIMER -- WARNING!    The ad for Obama which may follow this post is no way an endorsement of BO by this Blog.  We have no say as to the content of the advertising inserted herein, and the BO ad is a reflection of the audacity and stupidity of him and his re-election team.
We consider him to be a bigger liar than Clinton, fundamentally dishonest, and crippling to our economy; he has exacerbated racial tensions, inflamed partisan divisiveness, encouraged class warfare and demonized everyone on the right--especially members of the Tea Party Patriots.
.