ZIMMERMAN vs NBC SHOWS HOW MEDIA MANIPULATES NEWS AND DISTORTS THE TRUTH

Last Thursday, George Zimmerman filed suit against NBC News and three NBC producers he accuses of intentionally painting him as a racist. Zimmerman and his attorneys have now done what many in the new media only dream of doing, holding the major media responsible for their biased and misleading output.

The language in the complaint is blunt. It calls NBC's coverage "yellow journalism" and refers to "journalistic crimes." Most broadly, the complaint accuses NBC of trumping up a racism narrative for ratings, with a name check of the Today Show and Rev. Al Sharpton in particular. Here are some of the highlights or, if you prefer, the media's lowlights from the complaint:

     -NBC saw the death of Trayvon Martin not as a tragedy but as an opportunity to increase ratings, and so set about to create the myth that George Zimmerman was a racist and predatory villain. Their goal was simple: keep their viewers alarmed, and thus always watching, by menacing them with a reprehensible series of imaginary and exaggerated racist claims.
    -NBC created this false and defamatory mis-impression using the oldest form of yellow journalism: manipulating Zimmerman's own words, splicing together disparate parts of the recording to create the illusion of statements that Zimmerman never actually made.
    -Defendants pounced on the Zimmerman/Martin matter because they knew this tragedy could be, with proper sensationalizing and manipulation, a racial powder keg that could result in months, if not years, of topics for their failing news programs, particularly the plummeting ratings for their ailing Today Show.
    -The defendants media arson was ignited on March 19, 2012, when NBC and defendant [Jeff] Burside broadcast from Sanford, Florida the first manipulated audio of the call.
    -Defendants' improper juxtaposition of unrelated dialogue between Zimmerman and the dispatcher was specifically done to imply that Zimmerman had a racist motive.
    -Only after defendants' malicious acts were uncovered and exposed by other media outlets...did defendant NBC "apologize" and terminate some of those in its employ responsible for the yellow journalism identified in this Complaint.
    -In addition to portraying Zimmerman as a racist via their manipulative editing, the defendants also falsely claimed, without any legitimate basis -- and in spite of what the Sanford police had concluded -- that Zimmerman also stated a "racial epithet" during the call.
   
   Only after other news and internet media identified these outrageous manipulations did NBC address them, with a sham "investigation" that attempted to sweep their yellow journalism -- intended to exacerbate racial tensions, at the expense of Zimmerman and the truth -- under the rug; NBC's President, Steve Capus, made a bogus non-apology that claimed the doctoring was merely a "mistake."

    All of the defendant's actions have substantially contributed to a media frenzy including rallies provoked by NBC personnel such as the Reverend Al Sharpton (and employee of NBC, who reported on his own rallies on behalf of NBC) and public misunderstanding which has caused severe damage to the plaintiff, including death threats and a bounty for his capture.
 
    Due to the defendants' journalistic crimes, Zimmerman has been transformed into one of the most hated men in America. Plaintiff seeks substantial compensatory and exemplary damages to punish the defendants for their outrageous fraud upon the public, designed to mislead our nation, create a national uproar, forever ostracize Zimmerman, and taint his jury pool, all to profit and attract attention to their television news programs.

****
Just as bad, is the media's bias--particularly NBC and ABC--in failing to report on the "Fast and Furious" and "Benghazi" incidents.  They purposely ignore important news stories like those , which involved the deaths of American and Mexican people, and instead invest their time and resources 'ginning up' bogus racism accusations against someone who has not yet been found guilty of any crime.

Journalism in this country has become a tainted cesspool of bias advocates and, in my opinion, should no longer be considered as objective...nor as 'professionals.'  Students...choose another major!  Journalism no longer has any dignity attached to it.
.

THIS INCOMPETENT FOOL WAS HIRED BY LIBTARDS TO RUN OUR COUNTRY

This gem is on the “U.S. Constitutional Free Press” website.  It’s a list prepared by someone using the name “John Galt,” of all of the things, our incompetent Liar-in-Chief has NEVER DONE.   And thanks to ignorant ObamaVoters we hired this fool to run our country!

Barack Obama is a man who has:

* Never had to write a business plan
* Never had to review a business plan to determine its worthiness
* Never had to create a budget for a private business
* Never had to calculate the economic worth of an existing or new employee for a business
* Never had to worry about the cost of benefits provided to a business employee
* Never had to worry about whether or not a business was making a profit
* Never had to explain to a boss or to shareholders why a business was losing money
* Never had to file a business tax return
* Never had to talk to an accountant about business matters
* Never had to hire an attorney to deal with business matters
* Never had to worry about the effects of government regulations on a business he owns or operates
* Never had to tell an employee that he was being let go because business was slow
* Never had to place a “help-wanted” ad looking for a new worker
* Never had to look at a list of revenues and expenses to determine how much a new employee can be paid.
* Never had to face competition from a new business down the street

Good luck!  America is going to need it...especially our kids and Grandkids.
. 

THIS DUMBASS DEMOCRAT CONGRESSMAN SHOULD BE IN SECOND GRADE, NOT CONGRESS

Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.)....raised some eyebrows with a comment he made about the U.S. territory of Guam during a House Armed Services Committee hearing in May, 2010.  In a discussion regarding a planned military buildup on the Pacific island, Johnson expressed some concerns about the plans to Adm. Robert Willard, head of the U.S. Pacific fleet.

"My fear is that the whole island will become so overly populated that it will tip over and capsize," Johnson said. Willard paused and replied, "We don't anticipate that."  How he was able to keep a straight face and show some respect to this dumbass is beyond me.

Johnson is unquestionably one of the dumbest people in the world, let alone congress (but who gets to vote on legislation affecting our country) now says, “corporations control the patterns of thinking” in the United States and that the Bill of Rights to the Constitution should be amended so that the government is given the power to restrict freedom of speech.  WHAT?  SAY WHAT?

"We need a constitutional amendment to allow the legislature to control the so-called free speech rights of corporations," said Johnson.  “These corporations, along with the people they support, other millionaires who they’re putting into office, are stealing your government. They’re stealing the government and the U.S. Supreme Court was a big enabler with the Citizens United case,” Johnson said at the Annesbrooks HOA candidate Forum in Georgia in October.

“They control the patterns of thinking," said Johnson. "They control the media. They control the messages that you get. So, you are being taught to hate your government--don’t want government,"

AND THIS IDIOT GETS TO VOTE ON OUR NATION'S LAWS...AND WE ARE PAYING HIM!  WTF!  Aren't there some intelligence test that must be passed in order to get elected to Congress?
.

OBAMA'S OBSESSION WITH TAXING THE RICH AND HIS SOCIALIST TENDENCIES

Comments and Observations from Neal Boortz

Obama’s obsession with tax increases on the rich has NOTHING to do with raising revenue.  He KNOWS it won’t raise the revenue he claims.  This psychotic obsession stems from his long-held belief that people with a lot of money got that money by taking advantage of and exploiting others.  He learned this from his Marxist father.  He learned this from his anti-American mother.  He learned this from his mentor, Communist Party member Frank Marshall Davis.  He learned this from the Marxist professors and student groups he, by his own admission, gravitated to when he was in college.  Obama is trying to right what he believes is a horrible wrong --- all of these people who got all of that money by oppressing the poor.

This dangerous man is not concerned with growing our economy.  He never has been and he never will be.  This man’s entire campaign was ultimately about redistributing the wealth, and that may be one of the biggest campaign promises he actually manages to achieve.  Bigger than ObamaCare .. bigger than Dodd-Frank .. bigger than whatever major legislation he has in store for us over the next four years .. Obama’s biggest achievement has been the glorification of the moocher.  Not only has his administration literally enabled the moochers but he has emboldened the moochers by championing their cause for redistribution.  Now he’s bent on the destruction of the achievers.
.

The Liar-in-Chief and his hypocrites in the mass media hit another HOME RUN with this one.......from the "Bash Bush Files"

 “How many nightly newscasts would lead with this story if Bush were president?”  A reporter who was fortunate enough to be in the pool of news photographers who accompanied the president on his tour of the devastation along the Jersey Shore, and among those who got to photograph Donna Vanzant’s presidential hug encounter, returned to Brigantine last week to see how she was doing.
  
Vanzant has been moved by the many kindnesses she received from friends, family and customers.  She said she was honored to meet Obama, but she is also frustrated that she has yet to receive help from either her insurance companies or the government. “The president told me I would get immediate help,” she said.

“Looking back on it, it wasted a lot of people’s time,” she said of the visit.

It’s getting so you can’t take a politician who shows up at the site of a natural disaster and makes promises shortly before a national election completely at his word anymore. In spite of what Ms. Vanzant might think, the president’s visit certainly wasn’t a “waste of people’s time” from the perspective of Team Obama. No word yet on if Jamie Foxx plans to accuse Vanzant of blasphemy over this bit of criticism (Google "Jamie Foxx hailed President Barack Obama as “our Lord and savior” at the Soul Train Awards").

The original story and a photograph are still featured on the White House website... http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/10/31/president-obama-new-jersey-we-are-here-you

Then there is this bit of media hypocrisy that bugs me no end...but, again, no one ever reports on it.

Remember Cindy Sheehan, the left's cause-celeb, who remained camped out at Bush Ranch for months protesting the deaths of our soldiers?  Remember every day the press gave us the body counts?  

FYI:  THREE TIMES as many soldiers have died under Obama as we lost under Bush!  

Where is the media outrage? Where is Cindy Sheehan? Cindy and the media are perfectly fine with our soldiers dying, so long as they are dying under a Democratic president.

Brainwashed ignoranuses who voted for this disaster of a president must feel mighty proud of themselves!
.

OBAMA'S STUPID 'TAX THE RICH' POLICY EXPLAINED

Taxing the rich will not come any way near to balancing the budget, but it will give Oblamo more "free stuff" to give away to the mob of moochers and sponges THAT COMPRISE HIS BASE.  Look at how stupid his "Tax the Rich" policy is:  If he were to take 100%...100%....of all the income of taxpayers making over $250,000 per year, it would run the gov't for 141 days!  Got it?  141 days! 

But that would only last for one year because they would wisely stop working so hard (and start laying workers off) so that they wouldn't make over $250k any more.  Why should they?  Smart move, huh?

Furthermore, to illustrate the stupidity of Oblamo's tax policy, if he taxed 100%...100%....of  profits of the Fortune 500 corporations, and add them to the above, it would run the gov't for 181 days!  Got it?  181 days!  That's about a half year!  And then what would happen is that these corporations would go out of business or relocate to another country.  And what the hell do you think would happen to our economy then?

THIS IS WHAT THE IDIOT-IN-CHIEF REGARDS AS SOUND FISCAL POLICY???  GIVE ME A BREAK.
.

BLATANT HYPOCRISY IS THE NORM FOR DEMOCRATS; HARRY REID

I can understand how the dumb mass moochers, scroungers and sponges voted for these people; they are just plain dumb...and they want 'free stuff.'  But why educated ignorant libtards would allow this hypocrisy and wasteful spending to continue by voting for these lying socialists is way beyond my comprehension.

 For example, in 2006 during the Bush years Harry Reid said this about raising the debt ceiling: “They should explain how more debt is good for our economy … how can they explain that they think it’s fair to force our children, our grandchildren, our great-grandchildren, to finance this debt through higher taxes? Why is it right to increase our dependence on foreign creditors?” 

Watch how sincere he was in his admonition:



Yesterday he was asked by a reporter:  "Will you support raising the national debt by another $2.4 trillion?”   “If it has to be raised, we’ll raise it,” he said.

 On Aug. 2, 2011, Congress and Obama reached a deal to raise the debt ceiling by $2.4 trillion. Now, after only 15 months, almost all of that additional borrowing authority has been exhausted (wasted), according to the U.S. Treasury Department.

Another $2.4 trillion increase would bring the debt limit to about $18.8 trillion, though we can stop referring to a continually increasing number as a limit. There’s not a ceiling or a limit to anything they’re doing!

Fiscal policy is on an unsustainable path. Five years ago the debt-to-GDP ratio was around 36.5%, which was roughly the average for the previous 40 years. Now that ratio has doubled to about 72%, the highest percentage since shortly after World War II...and it continues to rise, which spells economic disaster for our country.

With these hypocritical, lying miscreants in power this country is 'going to hell in a hand basket' as the saying goes.
.

WASHINGTON POST COLUMNIST IN A RANDOM ACT OF TRUTHFUL JOURNALISM SEVERELY CRITICIZES OBAMA

WARNING: This Is A Random Act of Actual Journalism From An Obama Kiss-Ass Newspaper.

Finally, the Washington Post speaks out on Obama! This is a very honest, brutal and timely critique of our Liar-in-Chief.  As I’m sure you know, the Washington Post newspaper has a reputation for being extremely liberal. So the fact that its editor saw fit to print the following article about Obama in its newspaper makes this a truly amazing event and a news story in and of itself. At last, the truth about our President and his obvious socialist agenda is starting to trickle through the “protective wall” built around him by our liberal media.

* * * * * 

I Too Have Become Disillusioned.

By Matt Patterson   (columnist – Washington Post, New York Post, San Francisco Examiner)

Years from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of Barack Obama as an inscrutable and disturbing phenomenon, the result of a baffling breed of mass hysteria akin perhaps to the witch craze of the Middle Ages. How, they will wonder, did a man so devoid of professional accomplishment beguile so many into thinking he could manage the world’s largest economy, direct the world’s most powerful military, execute the world’s most consequential job? Imagine a future historian examining Obama’s pre-presidential life: ushered into and through the Ivy League despite unremarkable grades and test scores along the way; a cushy non-job as a “community organizer”; a brief career as a state legislator devoid of legislative achievement (and in fact nearly devoid of his attention, so often did he vote “present”); and finally an unaccomplished single term in the United States Senate, the entirety of which was devoted to his presidential ambitions.

He left no academic legacy in academia, authored no signature legislation as a legislator. And then there is the matter of his troubling associations: the white-hating, America-loathing preacher who for decades served as Obama’s “spiritual mentor”; a real-life, actual terrorist who served as Obama’s colleague and political sponsor. It is easy to imagine a future historian looking at it all and asking: how on Earth was such a man elected president? Not content to wait for history, the incomparable Norman Podhoretz addressed the question recently in the Wall Street Journal: To be sure, no white candidate who had close associations with an outspoken hater of America like Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant terrorist like Bill Ayers, would have lasted a single day. But because Mr. Obama was black, and therefore entitled in the eyes of liberal Dom to have hung out with protesters against various American injustices, even if they were a bit extreme, he was given a pass.

Let that sink in: Obama was given a pass – held to a lower standard – because of the color of his skin.  

Podhoretz continues: And in any case, what did such ancient history matter when he was also so articulate and elegant and (as he himself had said) “non-threatening,” all of which gave him a fighting chance to become the first black president and thereby to lay the curse of racism to rest? Podhoretz puts his finger, I think, on the animating pulse of the Obama phenomenon – affirmative action. Not in the legal sense, of course. But certainly in the motivating sentiment behind all affirmative action laws and regulations, which are designed primarily to make white people, and especially white liberals, feel good about themselves. Unfortunately, minorities often suffer so that whites can pat themselves on the back. Liberals routinely admit minorities to schools for which they are not qualified, yet take no responsibility for the inevitable poor performance and high drop-out rates which follow.
Liberals don’t care if these minority students fail; liberals aren’t around to witness the emotional devastation and deflated self-esteem resulting from the racist policy that is affirmative action. Yes, racist. Holding someone to a separate standard merely because of the color of his skin – that’s affirmative action in a nutshell, and if that isn’t racism, then nothing is. 

And that is what America did to Obama. True, Obama himself was never troubled by his lack of achievements, but why would he be? As many have noted, Obama was told he was good enough for Columbia despite undistinguished grades at Occidental; he was told he was good enough for the US Senate despite a mediocre record in Illinois; he was told he was good enough to be president despite no record at all in the Senate.

All his life, every step of the way, Obama was told he was good enough for the next step, in spite of ample evidence to the contrary. What could this breed if not the sort of empty narcissism on display every time Obama speaks? In 2008, many who agreed that he lacked executive qualifications nonetheless raved about Obama’s oratory skills, intellect, and cool character. Those people – conservatives included – ought now to be deeply embarrassed. The man thinks and speaks in the hoariest of cliches, and that’s when he has his Teleprompters in front of him; when the prompter is absent he can barely think or speak at all. Not one original idea has ever issued from his mouth – it’s all warmed-over Marxism of the kind that has failed over and over again for 100 years.

And what about his character? Obama is constantly blaming anything and everything else for his troubles. Bush did it; it was bad luck; I inherited this mess. It is embarrassing to see a president so willing to advertise his own powerlessness, so comfortable with his own incompetence. But really, what were we to expect? The man has never been responsible for anything, so how do we expect him to act responsibly? In short: our president is a small and small-minded man, with neither the temperament nor the intellect to handle his job. When you understand that, and only when you understand that, will the current erosion of liberty and prosperity make sense. It could not have gone otherwise with such a man in the Oval Office.

.

ANOTHER OBAMA FAILURE: NO BUDGET IN OVER 3 YEARS

According to CNS News the national debt has risen by $5 trillion in the three-and-a-half years since Obama's Democrat controlled Senate last passed a budget on April 29, 2009.  In fact, in 2011 and 2012 the Senate never even drafted a budget resolution.

The Dems cancelled a planned budget drafting hearing earlier this year, saying that the issue was better left until after the election. WTF!!!

Is it any wonder that our country is in such economic turmoil!  Anyone who would vote to keep this a$$hole in office for another four years IS A FOOL!
.

FOUR SIMPLE QUESTIONS OBAMA WON'T ANSWER

House Armed Services Chairman Buck McKeon (R-Calif.) has sent a letter to Obama demanding that he reveal exactly whom he ordered to do what on the day of the Benghazi attack.

McKeon than listed four questions he is demanding that Obama answer:

1) “To whom did you issue this first directive and how was this directive communicated to the military and other agencies--verbally or in writing?“

2) "At any time on September 11, 2012, did you specifically direct the military to move available assets into Libya to ensure the safety of U.S. personnel in Benghazi? If so, which assets did you order to Libya?

3) "At any time on September 11, 2012, other than ISR assets, did you provide the authority for the military to take any and all necessary measures to secure U.S. personnel, including specifically the authority to enter Libyan airspace?

4) "Did you have any communication with the Secretary of Defense, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, or any Commanders of regional Combatant Commands regarding military support to U.S. personnel in Benghazi on September 11th? If so could you please describe any recommendations provided to you regarding available military support and any orders you gave them?"

Why won't Obama answer these FOUR SIMPLE QUESTIONS  given his stated interest in transparency and sharing all relevant information with the American people and the families of our fallen????
.

WHY WOULD OBAMA AND BIDEN STAND BY AND ALLOW FOR AMERICANS TO DIE?

(Excerpted from Mark Steyn's column in National Review Online)

Why would Obama and Biden do such a thing? 

Because to launch a military operation against an al-Qaeda affiliate on the anniversary of 9/11 would have exposed the hollowness of their boast through convention week and the days thereafter — that Osama was dead and al-Qaeda was finished. And so Ty Woods, Glen Doherty, Sean Smith, and Chris Stevens were left to die, and a decision taken to blame an entirely irrelevant video and, as Secretary Clinton threatened, “have that person arrested.” And, in the weeks that followed, the government of the United States lied to its own citizens as thoroughly and energetically as any totalitarian state, complete with the midnight knock on the door from not-so-secret policemen sent to haul the designated fall-guy into custody.

When the president and other prominent officials stand by as four Americans die and then abuse their sacrifice as contemptuously as this administration did, decency requires that they be voted out of office as an act of urgent political hygiene.

At the photo-op staged for the returning caskets, Obama et al. seem to have been too focused on their campaign needs to observe even the minimal courtesies. Charles Woods says that at the ceremony Joe Biden strolled over to him and by way of condolence said in a “loud and boisterous” voice, “Did your son always have balls the size of cue balls?” One assumes charitably that the vice president is acknowledging in his own inept and blundering way the remarkable courage of a man called upon to die for his country on some worthless sod halfway across the planet. But the near-parodic locker-room coarseness is grotesque both in its inaptness and in its lack of basic human feeling for a bereaved family forced to grieve in public and as crowd-scene extras to the political bigshot. Just about the only formal responsibility a vice president has is to attend funerals without embarrassing his country. And this preening buffoon of pseudo-blue-collar faux-machismo couldn’t even manage that.

But a funny thing happened over the next six weeks: Obama’s own cue balls shriveled. Biden had offered up a deft campaign slogan encompassing both domestic and foreign policy: “Osama’s dead and General Motors is alive.” But, as the al-Qaeda connections to Benghazi dribbled out leak by leak, the “Osama’s dead” became a problematic boast and, left to stand alone, the General Motors line was even less credible. Avoiding the economy and foreign affairs, Obama fell back on Big Bird, and binders, and bayonets, just to name the “B”s in his bonnet. At the second presidential debate, he name-checked Planned Parenthood, the General Motors of the American abortion industry, half a dozen times, desperate to preserve his so-called gender gap. Yet oddly enough, the more furiously Obama and Biden have waved their binders and talked up Sandra Fluke, the more his supposed lead among women has withered away. So now he needs to enthuse the young, who turned out in such numbers for him last time. Hence, the official campaign video (plagiarized from Vladimir Putin of all people) explaining that voting for Obama is like having sex. The saddest thing about that claim is that, for liberals, it may well be true.

Both videos — the one faking Obamagasm and the one faking a Benghazi pretext — exemplify the wretched shrinkage that befalls those unable to conceive of anything except in the most self-servingly political terms. Both, in different ways, exemplify why Obama and Biden are unfit for office. One video testifies to a horrible murderous lie at the heart of a head of state’s most solemn responsibility, the other to the glib shallow narcissism of a pop-culture presidency, right down to the numbing relentless peer pressure: C’mon, all the cool kids are doing it; why be the last hold-out?

If voting for Obama is like the first time you have sex, it’s very difficult to lose your virginity twice. A flailing, pitiful campaign has now adopted Queen Victoria’s supposed wedding advice to her daughter: “Lie back and think of England.” Lie back and think of America. And then get up and get dressed. Who wants to sleep with a $16 trillion broke loser twice?

OBAMA WENT TO BED...AND FOUR AMERICANS ARE DEAD!

For the complete article go to:  http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/331806/incredible-shrinking-president-mark-steyn
.

AMERICANS WANT THE TRUTH --- NOT LIES BEFORE THE ELECTION!

During last weeks Town Hall debate, CNN's Candy Crowley validated Barack Obama's lie that he did call the September 11 attack on our consulate in Benghazi, Libya "an act of terror" just one day later.

That is a lie!!!

What Obama did say on September 12 was: "No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation."

Unfortunately, Crowley's blatant defense of Obama and primetime admonishment of Mitt Romney in front of tens of millions of television viewers gave the appearance that it was Romney who was in the wrong -- not Obama.

The truth is, five weeks after the deadly attack on U.S. soil that killed four Americans, Obama has yet to publicly declare that it was indeed a terror attack against the U.S. by Islamic extremists!

What happened on that Tuesday night underscores the need for an immediate and full investigation into what is a cover-up -- not just by the White House, but by the liberal media as well!

Journalistic integrity and honesty no longer matter where Obama is concerned. Getting to the truth about what happened in Libya and who was responsible for the slaughter of four Americans threatens Obama's re-election chances, and therefore, it must be twisted and distorted by the media to mislead and misdirect the American people.

As Rudy Giuliani said, they are "running out the clock" until after the election. Then we will have an investigation.

Americans want the truth, not lies -- BEFORE THE ELECTION!
.

Black Anger in Chicago at Obama: “He Done Did It. He Ruined It for Us. White People Don’t Feel Guilty No More and Won’t Do Stuff for Us Now”

“He Done Did It. He Ruined It for Us. White People Don’t Feel Guilty No More and Won’t Do Stuff for Us Now”

Check out this article from AMERICAN RENAISSANCE posted on October 15, 2022 
http://www.amren.com/news

Kevin DuJan, HillBuzz, October 8, 2012

Here in Chicago, I regularly meet with a group of friends who call themselves “The Think Squad”; these are men and women who are prominent members of the black community in Hyde Park and the City’s south side. None of them supported Barack Obama’s presidential bid in 2008 but most begrudgingly voted for him because they freely admit race-pride was their motivating factor. These people knew Obama when he was a state senator and saw him do absolutely nothing for blacks in Chicago back then . . . and they similarly saw Obama do nothing for blacks (or any of his constituents in general) as a United States Senator. The Think Squad has always seen through Obama and continues to speak out about his failings. Expect them, and other blacks coast to coast, to become even more vocal about the “magical first black president” after he loses in November and the anger of “how much that punk wasted” really comes to a boil and people no longer feel intimidated or threatened when the Obamas have left the White House for Hawaii next January. That’s when people will REALLY let it all fly, once the Obamas are no longer even a vestigial presence in Chicago and people have no fear at all in talking about what a sham their marriage is and how the two of them benefited from affirmative action and white guilt their entire lives.

The problem for blacks in Chicago is that the Obamas have actually ruined that white guilt for “the rest of us,” as the Think Squad put it last night at an impromptu after-church-programs dinner I enjoyed with some of the more outspoken “Thinkers” in a little Mexican restaurant near the south side. I try to go to as many of these events as I’m invited to because I always learn something new about how much many blacks actually detest Barack Obama, despite the fact that 95% of black voters are still going to cast their ballots for him in November. “Look, you just have to understand that if there’s a chance to vote for someone who looks like us on a ticket, especially for president, we ain’t gonna vote for no Romney. You put Allen West on a ticket some time and you’ll have blacks forgetting they were ever Democrat. Put that Mia Love on a ticket and watch blacks go nuts for her as VP or something in the future. Democrat Party “Who?” they will say because if you look at the skin and it looks like yours that’s just how you vote. This is the truth. Am I lying?” one older Thinker asked the table.

As we waited for our food to arrive most Thinkers enjoyed their margaritas and I sipped on my Coke while we talked about how consensus in the black community is that “white guilt has been all used up” and that “they were fools to put all the eggs in one basket with Obama.” I’ve never been clear on who “they” is in a sentence like that and the Thinkers were pretty torn on it themselves. “They” could be Democrats, who decided they wanted to run the first viable black presidential candidate in 2008 and that person should be Obama (and not Harold Ford Jr., whom the Clintons were actually grooming for years to fill that niche in the future but who ruined his chances for national office by marrying a blonde white woman instead of a black wife “like a Michelle” who’d be described by someone like Snoop Dog as “having a big a***”).

“Harold Ford Junior, or should I say Harold Ford LOSER was a damn fool. He could have been president some day but he married that white woman. You don’t marry a white woman, especially not a blonde, because you lose black voters that way. Black women hate black men that marry white women and they hate those white b****** for stealing our black men”, interjected a grandmother to my right in a gorgeous gray shawl and funky thick-framed glasses.

The subject of “using up all the white guilt” is an interesting one that dominated a large part of the conversation as we ate our meal. Speaking openly about this, the Think Squad told me in no uncertain terms that for decades black people have counted on white guilt to “get stuff, whatever we wanted” and that if the government or a corporation or whatever wouldn’t give in to demands from blacks they’d “just scream racism until everyone got scared and gave up.”

“They’d give up pretty easy too, actually. It was a game people played. You wanted something and you just had to time it right. The City especially would race to get you whatever you asked for if they thought Jesse would show up with his guys and scream and yell about racism if Daley didn’t give them what they wanted,” a Thinker told me about how easy it was for blacks to manipulate the system in Chicago by using threats of “RACISM!” cries to essentially extort Mayor Daley for concessions.

I learned that “white guilt” was a finite resource for blacks that many people believe has now been depleted during the Obama presidency. This is something that causes EXTREME anger in black ranks because “Obama didn’t care about what happens to everyone after he’s gone and living in that big house in Hawaii they bought for him”. That’s a reference to the $35 million “retirement estate” that wealthy Chicagoans like Penny Pritzker are working to purchase for the Obamas for occupancy come January 2013 when they are forced to move out of Washington.

“That’s all good for Barack and Michelle, but what happens to the rest of us? We ain’t getting squat from any of this. Worse, we don’t get to exploit the white guilt any more because that’s not there these days. It’s all gone. He done did it. He ruined it for us. White people don’t feel guilty no more and won’t do stuff for us now that they used to do so fast you wouldn’t believe it”, a Thinker in a bright, pretty pink blouse offered. “All of it is gone. They used it all up to elect him and to scream at anyone who said boo to him in the last four years. White people got used to being called racist all the time and aren’t scared about it anymore. I have no idea how I’m going to get funding for my programs now because I always counted on white people being too scared to say no to anything we needed at work. This is a disaster for the black community and it’s all because they put all the eggs in his basket and he f***ed it all up.”

It might be strange for you to imagine a very nice group of black professionals openly longing for the days when they could use white guilt as a bargaining chip to get things they wanted or needed, but this is just how things worked in the black community for the last forty years and everyone knew it.

Don’t even think about how cities are extorted by black “community leaders” with threats of accusing the City of being racist…or how big corporations have been shaken down for years by the combined antics of Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, and Henry Gates (the Justice Brothers)…but think about your own personal interactions with a lot of black people at work who have casually played cards like this against you or the big boss in the past. For many years, a lot of white people have been afraid to challenge black coworkers on anything because they were scared the black person would cry “RACISM!”. False accusations of racism have been the go-to defense for bad performance reviews and explanations for workplace conflict because collectively white people have been so scared out of their minds of being labeled a “racist” that they in many cases just went along with whatever the black person wanted to avoid that conflict.

“That’s just when you say, “Oh, is this because I am black?” and then people go running like it’s a fire drill to do whatever you want. It’s funny. But, this doesn’t work as much anymore and it’s because of Barack”, Pretty Pink Blouse admitted. “I think he ruined it for good. I mean, there’s been a black president. Most white people voted for him. They think they’ve done enough and aren’t afraid anymore”.

“You know how people on TV would say “I have black friends” and that was the thing they’d spit out when someone called them a racist? Well the new thing to say now is ‘I voted for Obama’ and that proves you are not a racist. Ain’t nobody saying they have black friends now. It is all ‘I voted for Obama’ and that is proof you aren’t a racist. People aren’t scared anymore.”

White people are about as scared of false accusations of racism as they are of rubber Halloween spiders.

This applies to the diminished power of the Justice Brothers…but also to rank and file blacks on the ground in cities like Chicago who are realizing that their bosses are no longer afraid of being called racists if they don’t give blacks promotions they didn’t really earn or breaks they don’t deserve when they’ve done something wrong.

It is a whole new ballgame, because Democrats exhausted the national reserve of white guilt to elect Barack Obama and to eviscerate his critics for the last four years. There is just no more white guilt left for blacks to keep using the way they always have and that has created palpable anger on the ground.

Yes, 95% of blacks who head to the polls to vote will be voting for Obama in four weeks because his skin looks like theirs and race-pride is an emotional pull that just can’t be overcome.

“This is a big deal. Ain’t nobody talking about it. But it’s real. He’s in big trouble over this, but sadly we’re all in trouble too”, I remember one Thinker telling me as we were leaving the restaurant and saying goodbye last night. ”I don’t know what we’re going to do now that white people aren’t scared of us any more. A lot of people are going to have to fend for themselves and it ain’t gonna be pretty. The magic’s all gone because they used it all up. And what did we get out of it? Nothing. Not a damn thing”.
.

WERE UNEMPLOYMENT NUMBERS MANIPULATED? WHO WOULD DO SUCH A THING???

The U-3 unemployment rate is the official number used as our unemployment rate, but it does not take into account part-time workers who want full-time work and discouraged workers who’ve given up looking.  If you actually count these people in order to calculate an unemployment rate, this is called the U-6 unemployment rate.  For September, the U-6 unemployment rate is 14.7%.  Interestingly enough, this number remains unchanged from the previous month. So it defies common sense that the U-3 rate could drop from 8.1% to 7.8%. 

The Obama regime decided that unemployment data would be collected and analyzed by the federal government instead of the states as it always had been before Obummer got elected?  Could this be why?  YOU DECIDE!

.

OBAMA PLOTS ANOTHER WAY TO BREAK THE LAW AND SCREW TAXPAYERS INTO PAYING FOR IT.

The Reader’s Digest reported that the Obama administration is trying to pull another unreported tactic to screw taxpayers into help pay for his re-election..   Because of sequestration cuts taking effect in 2013, many businesses that have government contracts (particularly those with defense contracts) were going to have to lay off workers as a result.  Now there is a law in place called the WARN Act, which requires that businesses which intended to do large layoffs must, by law, give their employees 60 days notice before those layoffs are to take effect.  Since the layoffs would take effect in January 2013, this means that these layoffs notices would have to go out in the beginning of November.  But what also happens in the beginning of November?  The presidential election!  So the Obama administration saw this coming.  They saw the PR disaster just days before the election of thousands of Americans receiving notices that they will be losing their jobs, thanks to a bill signed by the president.  So what did the Obama administration do?  They told these companies that they could simply ignore the WARN Act, and that there was no need to give these employees 60 days notice.

Well now, the Obama administration has upped the stakes. On Friday, the Obama administration issued guidelines for defense contractors, which said not only would it be “inappropriate” for these companies to issue these notices just days before the election, but that they would be “compensated for legal costs if layoffs occur due to contract cancellations under sequestration — but only if the contractors follow the Labor guidance.” 

In other words, the taxpayers will foot the legal costs associated with breaking the law, just to make sure that the president doesn’t look bad just days before the election.  I'm sorry, but aside from the Reader’s Digest, I didn't see this little maneuver reported by any of the major media 'journalists.'
.

WHITE HOUSE WILL MEET WITH MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD ACTIVISTS BUT NOT WITH NETANYAHUE

Who Is White House visitor Hisham Altalib?
by Michelle Malkin


On Friday, March 30, 2012, Hisham Y. Altalib visited the White House. According to visitor logs, Altalib was received by Joshua DuBois, the director of President Obama’s Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships. Four days later, White House officials welcomed a foreign delegation of the radical Sharia-enforcing Muslim Brotherhood from Egypt.

The White House meeting with overseas Muslim Brotherhood leaders was reported in April by a few mainstream journalists and questioned loudly by conservative media. But the White House confab in March with U.S.-based Altalib — which appears to be a prep session with the global Muslim Brotherhood’s American advance team — has received no attention until now.

So, who is Hisham Yahya Altalib? What is his agenda?

And why exactly did the Obama administration conduct domestic “faith-based” outreach with this Muslim Brotherhood figure in Virginia, who just happens to be 1) tied to bloody jihad and 2) a major contributor to the left-wing Center for Constitutional Rights, the group of jihadi-sympathizing lawyers who helped spring suspected Benghazi terror plotter Abu Sufian bin Qumu from Gitmo?

Altalib is an Iraqi-born Muslim identified by the FBI as a Muslim Brotherhood operative before he moved to America in the 1970s to earn an advanced electrical engineering degree from Purdue University in Indiana. By his own account, Altalib “soon became active in Islamic work in North America, which continues to this day.”

He was the “first full-time director of the Leadership Training Department of the Muslim Students Association of the United States and Canada (MSA)” — a longtime Muslim Brotherhood front group whose explicit goal is to “conquer” America through Islamic propagandizing.

Altalib is also a founding member of the SAAR Foundation and the International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT). Last year, his online biography proudly notes, he was “awarded the ISNA (Islamic Society of North America) Community Service Award.” The Saudi-subsidized ISNA is regarded as the primary U.S. umbrella group for Muslim Brotherhood fronts and was named specifically by the global MB godfathers as a key player in their “Grand Jihad” strategy of infiltration from within.

SAAR was founded in Herndon, Va., in 1983 as part of a radical Islamic charity front for Saudi financiers called the SAFA Group. The feds raided SAAR’s offices in 2002 as part of Operation Green Quest. Investigators confiscated 500 boxes and seven trucks’ worth of documents illuminating the network’s terror ties to the Al Taqwa Bank (a Swiss-based Muslim bank suspected of funding the 9/11 plot) and the Muslim Brotherhood.

Altalib worked for one of Al Taqwa Bank’s main owners, Youssef Nada. Altalib’s more prominent Muslim Brotherhood partner, Jamal Barzinji (one of the champions of the Ground Zero mosque), also worked for Nada. FBI and Customs officials believe SAAR/SAFA laundered money for a plethora of violent Muslim terrorist groups, from Hamas and Hezbollah to al-Qaida and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad.

Along with several other leaders of the “Ikhwan” (brothers), Altalib and Barzinji established the International Institute of Islamic Thought in Herndon, Va., in 1985. Global Muslim Brotherhood thug Yusuf al-Qaradawi — the fire-breathing, fatwa-issuing Jew-hater and violent jihad proselytizer — inspired IIIT’s mission: the “Islamization of social sciences.”

According to Steven Merley of the Hudson Institute’s Center on Islam, Democracy, and the Future of the Muslim World, IIIT has 14 affiliated offices across the U.S., Europe, the Middle East and Asia [his must-read report on the Muslim Brotherhood in the U.S. is here - PDF]. Former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy, who put 1993 World Trade Center bombing mastermind Omar Abdel Rahman behind bars, notes that IIIT was a demonstrated unindicted co-conspirator in the feds’ Holy Land Foundation terror financing case. IIIT supported convicted terror aides Sami Al-Arian and Abduhrraman Rahman Alamoudi.

Altalib, Barzinji and IIIT were also all listed in funding statements from the Center for Constitutional Rights as major donors giving in the $25,000 to $49,000 range.

CCR is the umbrella group providing more than 500 pro bono lawyers to Gitmo detainees. They have regularly dismissed national security concerns about Gitmo recidivism as “irresponsible … scare stories.” That’s exactly what they did after one of CCR’s clients, Libyan terror leader Abu Sufian bin Qumu, was sprung in 2007.

Fast-forward five short years. Qumu is now the lead suspect in the 9/11/12 attack on our U.S. consulate in Benghazi that resulted in the murders of U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens, consular official Sean Smith, and former Navy SEALs/private security contractors Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods. In the wake of this month’s terrorist attacks on our Egyptian embassy, Libyan consulate and Afghan air base, the jihad helpers at CCR are stone silent.

This administration’s idea of domestic “faith-based outreach” is tea with Muslim Brotherhood community organizers who have embedded themselves in American life for four decades with the express intent of “eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within.” Meanwhile, our commander in chief is squawking to the world about YouTube videos. The Ikhwan are laughing their bloodstained robes off.

***
.

MEDIA PROMOTES "FAKE CROWDS" FOR OBUMMER

The Associated Press call a Milwaukee, Wisconsin crowd that did not exist "the largest yet of Obama's reelection campaign."

Tom Blumer of NewsBusters caught the AP in the lie, explaining that both Politico and the Wall Street Journal had reported turnout for Obama at the Sep. 21 event as 18,000--at an arena that only held 5,000 people.

Though the arena was nearly full--and local media reported that more were outside the arena--there is no evidence whatsoever that the 13,000 people needed to make up the difference actually showed up. No images of that crowd have yet been produced.

The AP's take: "The crowd of about 18,000 in a steady drizzle was the largest yet of Obama's reelection campaign." And yet the AP did not count the audience. Nor did the Wall Street Journal. Nor did Politico.  So where did the official-sounding number come from? The Obama campaign, according to Politico--which was the only one of the three that had the minimal integrity to report the source of the estimate (though not to challenge it).

When the mainstream media calls a crowd is "the largest yet," but overestimates it by a factor of three or even four, you have a pretty good idea of how far they are willing to go to re-elect their patron saint.
.

OBAMA SUPPORTER INTERVIEWS HERSELF

.

STILL UNDECIDED? READ ON....

Some may think I’m being overly dramatic, but I am serious as cancer when I say that Barack Obama is a threat to the very existence of this nation as you and I have known it. 

The freedoms, politically and economically, that we’ve enjoyed will not be around for your grandchildren if this jerk is given four more years to complete his fundamental transformation of America.  He came to this country already despising what it stood for.  His own mother took extraordinary steps to make sure he wasn’t influenced by an increasing pro-American stepfather.  When he arrived in California to attend college in 1979 he had about as much of an understanding of what it means to be an American as I had of what it means to be an Inuit whale hunter. 

Obama TOLD us what he was going to do …  “We are just five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America!” … and we were too star-struck to ask him what he meant by “fundamentally transform”  Now perhaps you know.    It involves demonizing the rich – spreading divisiveness about their need to pay their fair share – and denigrating small business owners – the very people responsible for most of the job creation in this nation.  In many cases, he has abandoned the rule of law – the auto bailout bankruptcy proceedings, gutting welfare reform without Congressional approval, circumventing Congress to implement parts of the Dream Act.  He also expressly stated that what makes America great is our government spending.  That’s it! 

We have been the Beacon on the Hill, the world economic leader and political model for years because … our government spent money?  Are you kidding me?
.

OBAMANOMICS: this is an amazing video. You really need to watch it.

.

Why Obummer stepped in and tossed Bankruptcy laws aside with GM.

Under a Chapter 11 bankruptcy the business can elect to void contracts which it deems to be injurious to the business or which the owners or managers believe would prevent a successful reorganization.  One of the principal reasons the auto industry was in trouble was …unions.  Over the years the unions had created an overwhelming array of benefits and wages that were killing the auto industry.  Some of these auto workers were making the equivalent of $75 per hour or more in wages and benefits.

As a result of the recession, and the burden of it’s current union contracts, General Motors was hinting at a Chapter 11 bankruptcy to reorganize.  The United Auto Workers Union was concerned that GM might use this bankruptcy to re-negotiate their contract, which would mean reduced pay scales and benefits.  The UAW went to Obama, reminded him of their support in the past election, and hinted that he might want to do something to save them.  BO acted quickly.  Not being a rule-of-law guy, Obummer tossed the Bankruptcy Code aside and told GM’s secured creditors that they were going to have to take a back seat to the auto worker’s union in a restructuring of General Motors. What’s more, instead of going through traditional bankruptcy reorganization procedures, the government was going to step in with a massive multi-billion dollar bailout in exchange for GM stock.  The bond holders, the SECURED bond holders, were told that they were going to have to sit back and lose money on the deal … and that’s just the way it was going to be. (Is this the new America?)

So .. just what did Obama accomplish?  At best, he saved the UAW.  If Obama had allowed the laws of this country to take their course, GM might or might not have sought court protection while reorganizing.  If GM had filed for Chapter 11 it almost certainly would have emerged, just as American and Delta Airlines did, a stronger and more financially secure company.  Obama did NOT save the auto industry.  The laws were in place that the auto industry – GM – could have used to save itself.  Obama intervened and saved his union buddies.  Anything else he tells us is plain old BULLSHIT......just like most everything else that comes out of his mouth.
.

Look who parks their cash at Bain ---

---What Lying Hypocrites They Are!!!!!

Democrats convened in Charlotte, NC, will double down on their claim that Bain Capital is really the Bain crime family. They will accuse Republican nominee Mitt Romney and Bain’s other “greedy” co-founders of stealing their winnings, evading taxes and lighting cigars with $100 bills on their yachts.

But Bain’s private-equity executives have enriched dozens of organizations and millions of individuals in the Democratic base — including some who scream most loudly for President Obama’s re-election.

Government-worker pension funds are the chief beneficiaries of Bain’s economic stewardship. New York-based Preqin uses public documents, news accounts and Freedom of Information requests to track private-equity holdings. Since 2000, Preqin reports, the following funds have entrusted some $1.56 billion to Bain:

* Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund ($2.2 million)
* Indiana Public Retirement System ($39.3 million)
* Iowa Public Employees’ Retirement System ($177.1 million)
* The Los Angeles Fire and Police Pension System ($19.5 million)
* Maryland State Retirement and Pension System ($117.5 million)
* Public Employees’ Retirement System of Nevada ($20.3 million)
* State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio ($767.3 million)
* Pennsylvania State Employees’ Retirement System ($231.5 million)
* Employees’ Retirement System of Rhode Island ($25 million)
* San Diego County Employees Retirement Association ($23.5 million)
* Teacher Retirement System of Texas ($122.5 million)
* Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System ($15 million)

These funds aggregate the savings of millions of unionized teachers, social workers, public-health personnel and first responders. Many would be startled to learn that their nest eggs are incubated by the company that Romney launched and the financiers he hired.

Leading universities have also profited from Bain’s expertise. According to Infrastructure Investor, Bain Capital Ventures Fund I (launched in 2001) managed wealth for “endowments and foundations such as Columbia, Princeton and Yale universities.”

According to BuyOuts magazine and S&P Capital IQ, Bain’s other college clients have included Cornell, Emory, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Notre Dame and the University of Pittsburgh. Preqin reports that the following schools have placed at least $424.6 million with Bain Capital between 1998 and 2008:

* Purdue University ($15.9 million)
* University of California ($225.7 million)
* University of Michigan ($130 million)
* University of Virginia ($20 million)
* University of Washington ($33 million)

Major, center-left foundations and cultural establishments also have seen their prospects brighten, thanks to Bain Capital. According to the aforementioned sources, such Bain clients have included the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation, the Doris Duke Foundation, the Metropolitan Museum of Art, the Ford Foundation, the Heinz Endowments and the Oprah Winfrey Foundation.

Why on Earth would government-union leaders, university presidents and foundation chiefs let Bain oversee their precious assets?

“The scrutiny generated by a heated election year matters less than the performance the portfolio generates to the fund,” California State Teachers’ Retirement System spokesman Ricardo Duran said in the Aug. 12 Boston Globe. CalSTRS has pumped some $1.25 billion into Bain.

Since 1988, Duran says, private-equity companies like Bain have outperformed every other asset class to which CalSTRS has allocated the cash of its 856,360 largely unionized members.
Is Bain really a gang of corporate buccaneers who plunder their ill-gotten gains by outsourcing, euthanizing feeble portfolio companies and giving cancer to the spouses of those whom they fired? If so, union bosses, government retirees, liberal foundations and elite universities thrive on the wages of Bain’s economic Darwinism.

If, however, these institutions relish the yields that Bain Capital generates by supporting start-ups and rescuing distressed companies, 80 percent of which have prospered, then this money is honest — and Team Obama isn’t.

Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/look_who_parks_their_cash_at_bain_88KSQrw8BXciEidja2ZQXN#ixzz25WfrjmJU
.

OBAMA'S NEW CAMPAIGN MOTTO

Over the long weekend Democrats did some flip-flopping and danced around the “are you better off” question. Among them, Joe Biden, who Monday said you’re darn right we’re better off than we were four years ago. Joe didn’t want to take time to offer the audience any examples of why we’re so much better off than we were four years ago because he said it was too hot. That Biden… always concerned with everyone’s comfort.

So Here's the Motto for an Obama Future:  “If it weren’t so hot...”

• “If it weren’t so hot, I’d go into detail how four straight years of 8+% unemployment proves that my economic theories have succeeded.”

• “If it weren’t so hot, I’d go into detail why plunging the nation $16 trillion into debt is wise fiscal policy.”

• “If it weren’t so hot, I’d go into detail about how you didn’t build that.”

• “If it weren’t so hot, I’d go into detail about how aborting babies in the ninth month of pregnancy is a popular mainstream position.”

• “If it weren’t so hot, I’d go into detail why I support the Islamic extremists who have taken over Egypt.”

• “If it weren’t so hot, I’d go into detail about how selling guns to Mexican drug cartels is a good way to safeguard America.”

• “If it weren’t so hot, I’d go into detail how I personally helped cause the housing crisis.”

• “If it weren’t so hot, I’d go into detail how I promised high energy prices, then got what I wanted, then pretended it was bad news.”

• “If it weren’t so hot, I’d go into detail why I recycle the exact same speeches and campaign promises I gave back in 2008, as if I had achieved nothing.”

• “If it weren’t so hot, I’d go into detail as to why the entire Senate, including all Democrats, voted down my proposed budgets 99-0.”

• “If it weren’t so hot, I’d go into detail about why I can’t run on my record.”

• “If it weren’t so hot, I’d go into detail what I really mean when I say the Constitution is a ‘living document.’”

• “If it weren’t so hot, I’d go into detail, but since the media covers for me every time, I don’t really ever need to go into detail anyway.”

• (To be used in Biden speeches) “If it weren’t so hot, I’d go into detail about how they’re gonna put y’all back in chains.”

• “If it weren’t so hot, I’d go into detail about what ‘more flexibility after the elections’ means when translated into Russian.”

• “If it weren’t so hot, I’d go into detail about how Obamacare is a tax but it’s not a tax but now it’s a tax again.”

• “If it weren’t so hot, I’d go into detail about what’s in my college records.”

• “If it weren’t so hot, I’d go into detail as to how everything my opponents say, do or think is racist.”

• “If it weren’t so hot, I’d go into detail about why you personally must pay for other people’s condoms.”

• “If it weren’t so hot, I’d go into detail about all 57 states.”
.

Chris Matthews: 'If I Were Obama, I'd Marry' Bill Clinton

Can MSNBC's Chris Matthews make himself any more of a laughing stock? He's having fantasies that if he were Obama he'd "marry" Bill Clinton!

One has to wonder why people like Matthews have any credibility at all, with such obvious hero worship they engage in for Democrat leaders. As Matthews sits gushing like a schoolgirl, moon-eyed over a crush on political leaders, one has to wonder how his "analysis" could be possibly taken seriously by anyone.  Remember back when he said he gets a 'tingle' in his leg over Obama?

Matthews and his fellow MSNBCers simply have no credibility whatsoever. No wonder NBC is trying so desperately to distance itself from its cable cousin.
.

THE LIAR-IN-CHIEF TRIES TO FOOL US AGAIN WITH HIS BULLSQUEEZE

Obama told Black Enterprise magazine in an interview published last week: "we are digging ourselves out of a deep hole." But Obama's claim of creating 4.5 million jobs that he reiterated again on Thursday is simply wrong. Not only do we have fewer jobs in the U.S. today than when Obama first became president, nothing has been done for the 8 million additional working age people. By anyone's definition, this is not a "recovery."

For details go to:  http://www.realclearmarkets.com/articles/2012/08/13/president_obama_and_the_myth_about_45_million_new_jobs_99816.html
.

What kind of person is Mitt Romney ?

Sometimes, this facet of Romney's personality isn't so subtle. In July 1996, the 14-year-old daughter of Robert Gay, a partner at Bain Capital, had disappeared. She had attended a rave party in New York City and gotten high on ecstasy. Three days later, her distraught father had no idea where she was. Romney took immediate action. He closed down the entire firm and asked all 30 partners and employees to fly to New York to help find Gay's daughter.

Romney set up a command center at the LaGuardia Marriott and hired a private detective firm to assist with the search. He established a toll-free number for tips, coordinating the effort with the NYPD, and went through his Rolodex and called everyone Bain did business with in New York, and asked them to help find his friend's missing daughter. Romney's accountants at Price Waterhouse Cooper put up posters on street poles, while cashiers at a pharmacy owned by Bain put fliers in the bag of every shopper. Romney and the other Bain employees scoured every part of New York and talked with everyone they could, prostitutes, drug addicts, anyone.

That day, their hunt made the evening news, which featured photos of the girl and the Bain employees searching for her. As a result, ateenage boy phoned in, asked if there was a reward, and then hung up abruptly. The NYPD traced the call to a home in New Jersey,where they found the girl in the basement, shivering and experiencing withdrawal symptoms from a massive ecstasy dose. Doctors later said the girl might not have survived another day.

Romney's former partner credits Mitt Romney with saving his daughter's life, saying, "It was the most amazing thing, and I'll never forget this to the day I die."

So, here's my epiphany: Mitt Romney simply can't help himself. He sees a problem, and his mind immediately sets to work solving it, sometimes consciously, and sometimes not-so-consciously. He doesn't do it for self-aggrandizement, or for personal gain.

 

He does it because that's just how he's wired. Here are more examples:

Many people are unaware of the fact that when Romney was asked by his old employer, Bill Bain, to come back to Bain & Company asCEO to rescue the firm from bankruptcy, Romney left Bain Capital to work at Bain & Company for an annual salary of one dollar. WhenRomney went to the rescue of the 2002 Salt Lake Olympics, he accepted no salary for three years, and wouldn't use an expense account. 

 

He also accepted no salary as Governor of Massachusetts.

 

Character counts!!

 

 

For verification and even more details check Snoops at http://www.snopes.com/politics/romney/search.asp

. 

CAN ERIC HOLDER PLEASE EXPLAIN THIS TO BRIAN TERRY'S FAMILY?

 Fast & Furious Official Also Employed in Private Sector

ATF’s former Deputy Assistant Director for Field Operations, William McMahon, has been found double dipping his chip into the salsa. The man who had a significant role in Operation Fast & Furious is still fully employed by the ATF, while at the same time fully employed as
Executive Director of the Global Security and Investigations Group at J.P. Morgan in the Philippines.

The government allowed guns to walk into the hands of the Mexican drug cartels in Operation Fast & Furious. It is tied to the murders of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry, 300+ Mexican citizens, and more than 1,000 guns are still missing. No one has been held accountable. Those connected to the operation have either been allowed to resign quietly or reassigned to a different position, like Mr. McMahon.

Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa and Ranking Member Charles Grassley sent a letter to Acting ATF Director B. Todd Jones for some clarification on “this unusual arrangement.” Chairman Issa and Senator Grassley express their dissatisfaction that Mr. McMahon was allowed to stay at the ATF considering his role in Fast & Furious. They wrote:

“Despite these failings, ATF not only continues to keep him on its payroll, but also authorized him to take several months of annual leave while earning a six-figure salary from ATF and an even larger salary at the same time while working in the private sector.”

Under personnel regulations, the ATF management was under no obligation to approve McMahon's additional employment. Chairman Issa and Senator Grassley point out this approval “raises a host of questions about both the propriety of the arrangement and the judgment of ATF management.”
Unlike the whistleblowers of Fast & Furious, the ATF is protecting one of the men involved in the scandal. This arrangement also allows Mr. McMahon “to reach retirement eligibility while on extended leave for four to five months and simultaneously begin a second career before separating from government employment” and they did this before the Inspector General finished his report on Fast & Furious. Special Agent John Dodson, the first whistleblower, was told “he must wait until the Inspector General’s report is complete before the agency will even consider his simple request for a statement retracting the false statements made about him by agency leadership.”

The man who blew the lid on a very dangerous program has to wait until the Inspector General’s report is finished just to get the ATF to retract damaging statements against him, but the man who had a significant role in the program is lavished with money and job security.
Luckily for Agent Dodson, the IG report was distributed to the ATF and Department of Justice after a long 20 months. Hopefully he can get those statements retracted soon.

Source:   breitbart.com

FINALLY! An Obama College Classmate Speaks Up.

Excerpt from an article by Obama classmate, Wayne Allyn Root, on August 9, 2012

How did Barry Soetoro (Obummer) pay for all his fancy schools? If he had student loans or scholarships, don’t American students need good grades to maintain student loans?  I can only think of one answer…

So here’s my gut. I believe Obama got a leg up by being admitted to both Occidental and Columbia as a foreign exchange student. He was raised as a young boy in Indonesia. That’s a fact. His mother made him an Indonesian citizen. But… did his mother ever bother to change him back to a U.S. citizen? I’m betting not. He was abandoned by his mother and sent back to Hawaii to live with his grandparents. No one was paying much attention to young Obama, so his citizenship was never changed back. But suddenly as he nears college-age and starts thinking of how to get into college with lousy grades and no money… Obama learns that foreign students have a much easier path being admitted to U.S. universities. And even more amazingly, they get loads of aid and scholarships to attend college for free – something unavailable to U.S. citizens. It’s a completely different path – a path so easy that even a kid with no father… no mother to be found… no money… and lousy grades can get admitted to the best colleges… as a poor foreigner with an exotic background.

So a plan is hatched. Obama uses his Indonesian passport and citizenship to get into college. Suddenly even Ivy League Columbia University is a possibility for a foreign student from Indonesia. And it’s all paid for by the taxpayers.

That would explain how a poor student who rarely attended class and got mediocre grades, and with no money, was able to get accepted and pay for Occidental, Columbia and Harvard Law. The door magically opened for a foreign student. Every college needs one or two bright exotic foreigners to create “diversity.”

Now the sad reality is there is some U.S. student — a Valedictorian of his or her school — who never got to go to Columbia or Harvard Law because Obama fraudulently took their place.

That would also explain the great mystery of how in the summer of 1981 Barry Soetoro was able to travel to Pakistan when no U.S. citizen was allowed to travel there. An American couldn’t make that trip…but no problem if you’re an Indonesian citizen using an Indonesian passport?

For the full article go to:  http://personalliberty.com/2012/08/09/obamas-college-classmate-speaks-out-the-scandal-at-columbia-that-ends-the-obama-presidency/
.

10 Concepts Liberals Talk About Incessantly But Don't Understand

Re-posted from Townhall.com columnist, John Hawkins, a professional blogger who runs Right Wing News


1) Being Open Minded: To a liberal, this has nothing at all to do with seriously considering other people's ideas. To the contrary, liberals define being "open-minded" as agreeing with them. What could be more close-minded than assuming that not only are you right, but that you don't even need to consider another viewpoint because anyone who disagrees must be evil?
2) Racism: Liberals start with the presumption that only white people who don't belong to the Democratic Party can be racist. So, for example, even if Jeremiah Wright can make it clear that he hates white people because of their skin color or if liberals take an explicitly racist political position, like suggesting that black people are too stupid and incompetent to get identification to vote, they can't be racist. White Republicans, on the other hand, are generally assumed to be racist by default, no matter how much evidence there is to the contrary.
3) Fairness: In all fairness, I must admit that fairness is an arbitrary concept. So, you could make the argument that no one could get "fairness" wrong. Still, liberals do because they don't make any effort to actually "be fair." As a practical matter, liberals define "fairness" as taking as much as possible from people who they don't think are going to vote for them and giving it to people who may vote for them in return for their ill gotten largesse. Certainly conservatives, libertarians, and moderates might disagree about how much money to take from the wealthy to redistribute to the poor or how to help the disadvantaged, but the only liberal answer to the question, "How much is enough?" is "more."
4) Greed: To a liberal, believing that you pay too much in taxes or even opposing paying more in taxes is greedy. In actuality, wanting to loot as much money as possible that someone else has earned to use for your own purposes, which is what liberals do, is a much better example of greed.
5) Hate: Liberals often define simple disagreement with them on issues like gay marriage, tax rates, or abortion as hatred. No matter how well a position is explained, or the logical underpinnings behind it, it's chalked up to hate. Meanwhile, the angriest, most vicious, most hateful people in all of politics are liberals railing against what they say is "hatred." This irony is completely lost on the Left.
6) Investment: Actual investments involve putting money or resources into a project in hopes that they will appreciate in value. Liberals skip the second half of that equation. To them, an "investment" is taking someone else's tax dollars and putting it into a project that liberals approve of and whether a profit is made or lost is so irrelevant that they typically don't even bother to measure the results.
7) Charity: Contributing your own money or time to a good cause is charity. Liberals view themselves as charitable if they take someone else's tax dollars and give it away to people they hope will vote for them in return. At a minimum, they should at least credit the taxpayers who paid for the money they gave away for the charity, although it's not really charity if it's involuntary. Of course, there's nothing charitable about asking someone else to sacrifice for your gain, which could actually be better described as selfish.
8) Patriotism: Liberals love America the way a wife beater loves his spouse. That's why they're always beating up the country "for its own good." Doesn't the country understand that liberals have to hit it in the mouth because they LOVE IT SO MUCH?!?!? Of course, the conventional definition of patriotism, which is loving your country and wishing it well, isn't one that liberals can wrap their heads around.
9) Tolerance: In a free, open, and pluralistic society, there are all sorts of behaviors that we may have to tolerate, even though we don't approve of those activities. Liberals don't get this distinction. For one thing, they don't understand the difference between tolerance and acceptance. They also don't extend any of the tolerance they're agitating for to people who disagree with them. Liberals silence people who disagree with them at every opportunity which is, dare we say it, an extremely intolerant way to behave.
10) Diversity: What liberals mean by "diversity" is that they want a broad range of people from different races, colors, and creeds who have identical political views. A black or Hispanic conservative doesn't contribute to "diversity" in liberal eyes because he actually has diverse views. Incredible role models for women like Sarah Palin can't be feminists to liberals because she doesn't share the same liberal beliefs as sexist pigs like Anthony Weiner and Bill Maher. How can you have any meaningful "diversity" when everyone has to think the same way?

John Hawkins

John Hawkins is a professional blogger who runs Right Wing News, Linkiest, and Viral Footage. He's also the co-owner of the The Looking Spoon. You can read more from John Hawkins on Facebook, Twitter, G+, You Tube, & Pajamas Media. 

.

NHS and Canada's Healthcare Services!

First, they have a whole Wikipedia page "criticisms of the NHS"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_National_Health_Service#Access_controls_and_waiting_lists

waiting lists...superbugs...paying twice...

Oh, heres an article from 2000, lets see, NHS managers to blame for problems...due to poor management not lack of funding says this BBC article...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/844852.stm

11 years later, 2011 NHS problems continue to haunt coalition government...seems like they didn't solve anything in a decade...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/joepublic/2011/jun/14/nhs-reform-problems-haunt-coalition

Just today! boy dies of thirst due to lazy nurses in hospital! seems like the british medical staff aren't as professional as they could be...wonder why?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/9386835/Kane-Gorny-inquest-doctors-did-not-know-patient-22-who-died-of-thirst-was-there.html

I can't wait for Obamacare to kick in! 

let's see, Canada? 

Heres a bit of news off Wikipedia, lets see if they're doing any better?

The median wait time in Canada to see a special physician is a little over four weeks with 89.5% waiting fewer than 90 days.^[52]

The median wait time for diagnostic services such as MRI and CAT scans ^[53] is two weeks with 86.4% waiting fewer than 90 days.^[52]

The median wait time for surgery is four weeks with 82.2% waiting fewer than 90 days.^[52]

Another study by the Commonwealth Fund found that 57% of Canadians reported waiting 30 days (4 weeks) or more to see a specialist, broadly in line with the current official statistics. A quarter (24%) of all Canadians waited 4 hours or more in the emergency room.^[54]

Sounds great!  I'll just be over here reading Golf Magazine waiting my 4 hours with a bullet in me in the ER waiting room, no worries.

Heres something to look forward to:

http://articles.cnn.com/2009-07-06/politics/canadian.health.care.system_1_government-run-health-health-care-system-mayo-clinic?_s=PM:POLITICS

.

OBAMA IS ONE, BIG, LYING JERK!

Obama said recently on his Campaign Bus tour that Romney’s experience has been in owning companies that outsource jobs, while “my experience has been in saving the American automobile industry.”

First of all – this outsourcing comment is absolute nonsense. If we didn’t outsource jobs your iPhone would cost you $2500 and an iPad would be around $4000. Thanks to outsourcing you can buy a computer – a computer that vastly increases your own job performance and profitability – for under $1000. End outsourcing and you’ll be paying ten grand for that computer. And for the dedicated Obama voters .. those Nikes would cost you hundreds of dollars more per pair.

And what about this “saving the American automobile industry” crap!  Obama did NOT save the American automobile industry. Obama saved the United Auto Worker’s Union (UAW).

The automobile industry was going to survive one way or the other. That’s what bankruptcy laws are for. General Motors, for instance, probably would have filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition, just as Delta Airlines and many other prominent American companies have done. GM would then have abrogated some contracts, revised others, streamlined operations, shut some plants … or, in other words, reorganize! That’s what a Chapter 11 bankruptcy is! Reorganization! Now this reorganization idea did not sit that well with the UAW. Under a Chapter 11 bankruptcy GM could have gone to the UAW and forced them into contract concessions involving both pay and benefits .. including an end to the asinine jobs banks .. and this would be very bad for union leaders indeed. So the union bosses got to Obama .. and Obama stepped in. Truth is, Obama just threw the law aside … tossed hundreds of years of bankruptcy law aside … and, as a ruler, rather than a leader, would do, forced the parties into an arrangement that gave the unions what they wanted while royally screwing secured creditors.

Where are we now? GM is operating, but not doing all that well. The Chevy Volt is a government-subsidized boondoggle. And the federal government still owns massive amounts of GM stock. Now Obama promised that this stock would be sold, the taxpayers would make a profit, and GM would return to private ownership. Hasn’t happened. Why? Because if Obama sold that GM stock right now the U.S. taxpayers would take a $35 Billion dollar hit. That’s Billion, not million. Pay attention.

Oh .. and don’t forget the hundreds of GM dealers that Obama ordered closed .. and the employees of those dealers who lost their jobs.

Obama is a one, big, lying jerk....and this is just one example of how he proves it time and time again.
.

DO LIBERALS EVER SPEND THEIR OWN MONEY ON ANYTHING?

Is there no limit as to how low class these moochers can be?

Just when you thought the Obama campaign couldn’t get any more desperate, they come up with this: the Obama Event Registry, asking supporters who are getting married, having a birthday, or celebrating an anniversary to direct gift-givers to Obama’s re-election website.

This is truly insulting. Young couples have been the folks hardest hit by the Obama economy; unemployment rate among the young is at all-time highs. Yet Obama suggests that we should send money not to those couples, but to the campaign of the man who has put them on the bread lines.

Will these moochers ever stop trying to get their hands on our wallets?
.

MODERN DAY VERSION OF 'TRAIL OF TEARS!'

That Elizabeth Warren, the wealthy libtard who is trying to unseat Republican Scott Brown in the U.S. Senate, exploited the rich history of our Native cultures for personal gain and academic accolades while actual indigenous students struggled, is reprehensible.

After succeeding in that exploitation and personal gain, Warren refused to give back to the culture she exploited. How much would it have meant to have a real "woman of color," a real American Indian female educator at Harvard who used her position to bring greater awareness to the educational needs of indigenous Americans?

Instead Elizabeth Warren snubs Cherokee activists when they try to meet with her. Check it out.

Just another glaring example of liberal hypocrisy!
.

HEY LIBTARDS, WHEN JON STEWART IS OUTRAGED OVER HOLDER AND OBAMA YOU KNOW THE HYPOCRISY IS BLATANT!

The one person who understands the seriousness of Operation Fast & Furious is a comedian.
Comedy Central's liberal icon Jon Stewart not only told his "Daily Show" viewers about Fast & Furious last night, but he called out the Democratic hypocrisy concerning executive privilege.

There’s no spin or distortion. The only problem I have is he didn’t mention the name of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry who died allegedly from a Fast & Furious weapon.

Even when he explains that Fast & Furious was supposed to be a tactic to find out where the gunrunners got the guns for the cartel, you can tell he’s in disbelief that our government would do this. As Stewart states, they got the guns from our government!

Stewart even included the fact that the Department of Justice lied in its Feb. 4 letter and had to retract it nine months later.

Then it’s time for the issue of executive privilege, and Stewart isn’t falling for the Democrats defense tactics. He’s also upset how the Democrats who were outraged when President George W. Bush cited executive privilege aren’t outraged about President Obama's use of the legal maneuver.

Frankly, everyone should be outraged about this situation no matter their ideological bent. Our government allowed known gun smugglers to buy guns and give them to the drug cartels without anyway of tracing them. And, as a result, Terry and roughly 300 Mexicans are dead.
.

HEY HOLDER, YOU SNIVELING WEASEL, WHY AREN'T YOU FILING A LAWSUIT ABOUT THIS?

WHAT A HUMUNGOUS HYPOCRITE!!!!!

At a recent Obama rally in Ohio, prospective attendees were told to brandish their photo IDs if they expected admittance to the rally. No word yet on whether Attorney General Eric Holder plans to file suit against the Obama campaign for infringing upon Ohioans' right of peaceful assembly by way of a racist photo ID rule.

    Jessica Kershaw, the Obama campaign's Ohio Press Secretary, confirmed in a statement to BuzzFeed that the campaign checked every supporter's identification at the door.

    "We checked every ID at the door to make sure it matched with the name on the ticket that supporters filled out," she said. "We did this for every person who came in."

Since President Obama sides with Holder in thinking it's racist for states to require photo identification to vote, he must be apoplectic at himself for discriminating against those who don't get state-issued photo IDs. By asking for rally-goers to provide photo ID before entry, the Obama campaign is silently sanctioning the effectiveness of photo identification.

What makes a rally different from voter integrity? What makes buying cigarettes, alcohol, renting a car, a hotel room, cashing a check, opening a bank account, membership at the Y, buying cold medicine, or entering a club any different? You check photo identification to protect the thing which such an exchange accesses and to confirm that you are the age you claim. Is a person's vote less unworthy of protection than buying Sudafed -- or attending an Obama rally?
.

Big Three Ignore Religious Freedom Rallies

CBS Played Up Dissenting Catholics' Protests

Published: 6/11/2012 6:10 PM ET 

 

 ABC, CBS, and NBC stayed true to their liberal slant and ignored the 164 rallies across the United States on Friday against the federal government's abortifacient/birth control mandate under ObamaCare. Religious leaders and conservative politicians, like former GOP presidential candidate Rep. Michele Bachmann, addressed the tens of thousands of pro-religious freedom activists who attended the rallies. But the Big Three apparently didn't think this was worthy of coverage on their morning and evening newscasts.

By contrast, CBS played up the supporters of a group of left-leaning Catholic nuns during four on-air segments between May 30 and June 1, 2012. Correspondent Wyatt Andrews hyped how "hundreds of Catholics have rallied behind the sisters," and that "protests in support of the nuns have been held in almost 50 cities." 

 

For full story go to:   http://www.mrc.org/biasalerts/big-three-ignore-religious-freedom-rallies-cbs-played-dissenting-catholics-protests

.

WHAT IS RACIST?

What is racist:

Saying Obama is from Illinois.
Saying Obama is from Hawaii.
Not referring to Obama as 'President Obama.'
Referring to Obama as 'President Obama.'
Criticizing ObamaCare.
Criticizing MediCare.
Criticizing Social Security.
Twiddling your thumbs.
Holding a steady job.
Watching reruns of The Brady Bunch.
Listening to classical music.
Eating apples or other fruit.

What isn't racist:
Drawing a blank here. I can't think of anything that isn't racist now that Obama is president.
.

HERE ARE THE FACTS!

According to the Commerce Department, the recession has been over for three years as of this month (June).  That means that for most of Obummer’s presidency, we have lived under the ObamaRecovery, and it has been the worst economic recovery in American history.  Those are facts.
.

'Votemout' Found To Be Effective Cure for 'Gonorrhea Lectim'

A few years ago the Center for Disease Control issued a warning about a new virulent strain of an old disease.  It’s a strand of Gonorrhea known as Gonorrhea Lectim. Now the WHO is issuing its own warning.  This disease, according to the WHO, is growing more and more resistant to modern drugs and could soon become untreatable. The disease truly is an obomanation.

The disease is contracted through dangerous and high risk behavior which involves sticking your head up your butt.  Many victims contracted it in 2008 ... but now most people, after having been infected for the past 3-4 years, are starting to realize how destructive this sickness is.

This is all so sad because Gonorrhea Lectim is easily cured with a new drug just coming on the market called Votemout.  You take the dose in 2012 and simply don't engage in such behavior again; otherwise, it could become permanent and eventually wipe out all life as we know it.

Several states are already on top of this, like Wisconsin and North Carolina, and apparently now Massachusetts, with many more seeing the writing on the wall.

Please pass this important message on to all those bright folks you really care about.  Apparently the original strain of Gonorrhea “could soon become untreatable.”   If that becomes the case with Gonorrhea Lectim, then bend over and grab your ankles!

.

SCHEDULE FOR DEMOCRAT CONVENTION IN AUGUST

This gem re-posted from Neal Boortz's website.

For those of you who may or may not be attending the Democrat convention in August, I thought you may want to take a sneak peek at the schedule.

4:00 PM Opening Flag Burning Ceremony

4:05 PM Singing of "God Damn America" led by Rev. Jeremiah Wright

4:10 PM Pledge of Allegiance to Obama

4:15 PM Ceremonial 'I Hate America ' led by Michelle Obama

4:30 PM Tips on Dodging Sniper Fire, Hillary Clinton

5:00 PM UFO Abduction Survival, Joe Biden

5:30 PM Eliot Spitzer Speaks on "Family Values" via Satellite

5:45 PM Tribute to All 57 States

6:00 PM Joe Biden Delivers 100,000-Word Speech Featuring 23-Minute Question and 2-Hour Answer

8:30 PM Airing of Grievances by the Clintons

9:00 PM Bill Clinton Delivers Rousing Endorsement of Obama Girl

9:15 PM Tribute Film to Freedom Fighters at Gitmo , Michael Moore

9:45 PM Personal Finance Seminar - Charlie Rangel

10:00 PM Denunciation of Bitter Gun Owners, Rosie O'Donnell

10:30 PM Ceremonial Waving of White Flag for Iraq & Afghanistan

11:00 PM Obama Energy Plan Symposium/Tire Gauge Demonstration

11:15 PM Free Gov. Blagojevich rally

11:30 PM Obama Accepts Tony and Latin Grammy awards

11:45 PM Feeding of the Delegates with 5 Loaves and 2 Fish , Obama Presiding

12:00 AM Official Nomination of Obama by Bill Maher

12:01 AM Obama Accepts Nomination as Lord and Savior

12:05 AM Celestial Choirs Sing

3:00 AM Biden Delivers Acceptance Speech
.